Re: [evonline2002_webheads] Voice Chat - Summary
- Susanne - thanks for the great summary of today's chat that you posted in
the LearningTimes blog. Saves me the trouble of doing it!
But I will post my thoughts as well - maybe in the text discussion area of LT.
Thanks again Susanne. Your input and summary is really appreciated.
- Michael C.
At 12:19 PM 6/4/2003 +0200, you wrote:
>I'll try to be with you on Friday, too, Michael! I do not sleep that late :-)
- Well, I'm reading this at 15:30 GMT Friday, having just got back from a weekend trip. I guess my excuse is I didn't know about it. Hope it went well,
> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 22:43:54 +0930
> From: Michael Coghlan <michaelc@...>
> Subject: Re: Re: Voice Chat - this Friday (June 6th)
> Thanks for your best wishes Michael. I'll be holding some other voice chat
> events at different time so everyone has the chance to attend over the
> months ahead.
> - Michael C.
> At 09:39 AM 6/5/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> >Thursday, June 5th
> >Hi Michael,
> >I would really like to participate in tomorrow's Voice Chat, but I
> >would only be kidding myself if I said I would be ready and coherent,
> >and in my office at 7 a.m. I hope to participate in this with all of
> >you sometime soon however.
- At 10:19 PM 6/6/2003 +0400, you wrote:
>Well, I'm reading this at 15:30 GMT Friday, having just got back from aHope you trip was relaxing Vance. Here's what happened in the Voice Chat:
>weekend trip. I guess my excuse is I didn't know about it. Hope it went well,
About 10 people turned up for a voice chat today (June 6th) on the use of
Voice Chat as an Instructional Tool. Despite the fact that the facilitator
(yours truly) was thrown out of the chat at regular intervals the
conversation flowed. We didn't get through anywhere near as much as I'd
hoped but that was a good lesson learned. It is important to allow input
from others and that of course eats into 'presentation time'. Perhaps it is
important in a bare voice chat (no talking heads or graphic stimulus of any
kind) to allow opportunities for interaction more than you might in a f2f
Susanne took the initiative and summarized the spoken conversation in the
text chat, and many of us confessed to multitasking behind the scenes! We
asked whether or not this is an acceptable thing for students to be doing
while they are listening to a remote presenter&..is it? What do you think?
Aiden asked how a teacher is supposed to keep 23 students focused on a
voice lecturein the absence of any visual stimulation? My personal feeling
is that students in such situations should be left alone to multitask of
they want, but it was suggested that this kind of event would be better
staged in a virtual classroom with graphics, polling, and other interactive
features. But of course there is a substantial cost for that type of
software. This led to a discussion on whether or not there should be a
level of public funding to subsidise the purchase of these higher end tools
We also talked about the fact that we have all become very dependent on
saved logs or archives of text based web events, and that few voice chat
tools as yet allow the facility to record conversations. As Susanne notes
in her blog, we have gone back to where we came from taking written notes
on the important points from a voice presentation. So,
* Is it OK for people to multitask while they are listening to a remote
* How do you (or should you) keep 23 students focused on a voice
lecturein the absence of any visual stimulation?
* Should there be a level of public funding to subsidise the purchase
of these higher end tools such as virtual classrooms?
- Michael C.
PS Susanne, Aiden, and Damian - if you reply here can you also place it in
LearningTimes? Ta, Michael.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]