Re: [evonline2002_webheads] What If Zuck Meant It?
- I'm like the guy with a hammer and all he sees - or cares about - is nails.
In the Forbes/Facebook article (thanks Bee) the absence of the
"nails" that I believe /should/ be there is clear. How can Facebook,
perhaps in a joint venture with Google, /really/ make a difference
for the whole entire planet? I say it would be for them to, first,
throwing the widest net they could throw asking the single question:
"What's the Singe Most Important Thing We Could Do to Improve the
My response would be to advocate for more conservation, more
preservation, more sanctuaries, more protection - for the planet. I
would narrow that to concentrate on the Oceans, rivers, waste and
water treatment. On this matter, Dr. Slyvia Earle has it exactly
right: "All that is at stake is the whole human race."
If there is a more urgent, more important "thing" that Facebook
and/or Google could do than to advocate for this "cause"? I honestly
don't know of one. But the collective wisdom and intelligence of
Webheads could well have a better idea. If so, I would love, love,
love to hear it. And, then, when that "answer" is agreed upon, how
would Webheads provoke Google/Facebook sufficiently to take up the
At 6:22 PM -0300 5/11/12, Barbara Dieu wrote:
>Good article by Jerry Michalski in Forbes