Re: [multilit] Re: [evonline2002_webheads] SpeedGeeking at 1300 GMT Sunday Jan 24 2010
- Delete the dot from the end of Vance's url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_geeking
As usual with Wikipedia there are some interesting links at the bottom of the page.
On 24 Jan 2010, at 03:29, Vance Stevens wrote:
> Hi Carla,
> Break the concept of speedgeeking? You? No way, and in any event our goal
> is to expand it.
> That's a great idea. Of course, asynchronous voice threads as speedgeeking.
> In a way you could expand further and say that any short tutorial screencast
> is a kind of speedgeeking event. But to do one in a voicethread teaches in
> and of itself.
> There is an entry for speed geeking in Wikipedia
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_geeking. As with many such concepts, the
> idea was meant to pack as much learning as possible into a face to face
> event. When I googled speedgeeking I got the WiAOC page where we had
> originally adapted the concept after we were introduced to it by Kim Cofino
> and Jeff Utecht:
> Here you'll find a further explanation of how we arrived at adapting the
> concept for virtual spaces as well as a link to Teresa Almeida d'Eca's brief
> 5 min presentaton on Tag Galaxy: http://tinyurl.com/090614tag-galaxy
> So far I don't think anyone besides me has volunteered to give a speedgeek
> today, but I'll soldier through with it to further illustrate the concept,
> just a 5 minute presentation and Elluminate recording.
> Anyone is welcome to attend. The venue for the presentation will be today,
> Sunday Jan 24, 13:00 GMT (-ish) at http://tinyurl.com/y3eh
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carla arena" <carlaarena@...>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [evonline2002_webheads] SpeedGeeking at 1300 GMT Sunday Jan 24
> > Dear Vance,
> > I'd love to join you , but it won't be possible due to family
> > appointments.
> > I was just wondering if we could adapt the speedgeeking model of
> > synchronous
> > meeting to one asynchronous speedgeeking in voicethread, for example,
> > where
> > we could participants just recording their tour exploring one tool, idea,
> > etc...Is it a possibility or would I be breaking all the concept of
> > speedgeeking?
> > Just thinking out loud!
> > Carla
> > http://collablogatorium.blogspot.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]