Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

72609RE: [evol-psych] Article: Feminist Public School System is a Toxic Environment

Expand Messages
  • Zaphod Beeblebrox
    Jun 30, 2008
      'The article was composed
      entirely of assertions. There was a perfect void of evidence. The
      essence of the article was that women, especially lesbians, were all
      advantaged and that men were all disadvantaged.'

      -----Original Message-----
      From: evolutionary-psychology@yahoogroups.com
      [mailto:evolutionary-psychology@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Martin Sewell
      Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 4:32 AM
      To: evolutionary-psychology@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [evol-psych] Article: Feminist Public School System is a Toxic

      [ source: http://www.henrymakow.com/feminist_public_schools_are_a.html ]

      By Brian Simpson (pseudonym)

      I've been a supply teacher for 20 years in every subject area, K-12 in
      over 200 schools and in over 1000 classrooms in a large Canadian city.
      I can report that the education system has been taken over by feminists
      and lesbians who preach a daily diet of hate, violence and
      discrimination against males despite pretenses of "tolerance" "non
      violence" and "inclusiveness."

      It's moderately common to find girls wearing anti-male, hate clothing.
      Slogans on T-Shirts include: "Stupid Factory:Where Boys are Made;" "BOYS
      ARE STUPID, THROW ROCKS AT THEM!" and (prefixed by the profile view of a
      handgun) "He had it comin'"

      MENtal Breakdown MENstrual Cramps MENopause Did you ever notice how all
      our problems begin with MEN."

      Can you imagine if these comments were addressed at girls?

      I've been in staff rooms where I have read pamphlets issued by the
      Canadian Federation of Teachers about Afghanistan. Exclusive concern
      was shown for women, girls and female babies and none for males despite
      the fact that boys had the double-whammy-plus of being forced to carry a
      gun, kill and be killed, traumatize and be traumatized, starting as
      early as eight-years-of-age. They had been denied schooling and been
      traumatized for life. The girls only had been denied schooling.

      I've been in classrooms where videos were shown blaming all date
      violence on males. No sexual violence female-to-male was mentioned and
      women were referred to as "men's property." Once the video had been
      shown, the girls overflowed with anti-male hate statements and the boys
      were afraid to speak on any matter. I told students that the video's
      depiction was false but they insisted that the video depiction was the
      absolute truth. Such indoctrination is the norm in schools.

      In the context of the omni-present, "Women's History Month" posters in
      the school, I have been in homerooms in which the boys are so abused by
      their feminist teachers that they cannot even whimper, even after serial
      attempts to get them to say anything at all. In one classroom in which
      Grade-12 students were nearing their graduation, I had a boy cry about
      the climate of ever-climaxing anti-male hate.


      As a male, I am routinely discriminated against for employment with no
      recourse to authorities.

      In supply teaching, patterns emerge such as gender-cleansing in the
      early years (Men need not apply.) The substitute clerks want women, and
      when they can't get them (a rarity), a man can get called at the last
      minute (late calls generally translate as, "I-couldn't-get-a-woman call").

      In my experience, all substitute clerks are women. In the last two
      decades, phone/computer machines have been put into place in various
      districts. As a result, when IT phones instead of SHE, the early years
      open up to men, initially. The resultant realization that the
      conventional gender-cleansing is not in place results in male supply
      teachers being "greeted" by school secretaries (always women) who ask
      the man reporting to the office in the morning, "What are YOU doing
      here?" "I'm here for____(a woman teacher)."

      In response to that, the secretary reports the man to the principal who
      tries to gender-cleanse by saying to the male supply teacher, "I can
      give you Grade 5." "No, thanks, I'll take the Kindergartens." I've
      even had to discuss such matters for two minutes with some principals.

      In the hundreds and hundreds of applications I have put into for
      teaching jobs, I have never had a response to any application for Grade
      2, Grade 1 nor Kindergarten; and I've only had one interview for a
      position in Grade 3--which was assigned to a woman.


      Here are some of my experiences as an Education student.

      First of all, to be in teaching is to be immersed in femininity.
      Wall-to-wall women, everywhere; the students, the teaching staff, the
      curriculum, the posters on walls, the celebrations, the laments, the
      teacher unions, the student unions, the union unions. In perfect
      lock-step, all are one, and half of humanity counts for nothing, except
      to be harmed, of course.

      In one class, the professor had issued a 4-page photocopy to all
      students (26 women and 3 men in the room). The article was composed
      entirely of assertions. There was a perfect void of evidence. The
      essence of the article was that men, most especially white men were all
      advantaged and that women were all disadvantaged.

      The monomania was so advanced that one black woman complained that
      whereas there was affirmative action for women, including black women,
      it was mostly Caribbean black women who got the jobs and not the African
      black women. The women in the room gushed with sympathy that such a
      situation could persist in Canada. Various women-as-victim and
      men-as-victimizer as the universally advantaged had serialized. I
      waited for an almost void in the lament and had declared various facts.

      I pointed out that in Canada's armed services, over 116 000 men and boys
      and only 30 women and no girls had been killed in service and that the
      response of governments in Canada and elsewhere the world over had been
      one of, "Advance women."

      I pointed out that in the civilian work world, up to 2005, just over 96%
      of job-caused deaths were male and that as of 2006, with the boom in the
      economy, for the first time, just over 1000 men and only approximately
      20 women were killed.

      The women who spoke (about 12 of them), utterly whaled against me in
      seething frenzied hate. It was like being in a Nazi Party meeting. I
      was shouted-down. In fact, the women who insisted that the proper world
      order was save-the-women/kill-the-men, complained vociferously to the
      knights in shining armor (the few men who were allowed into the teaching

      These professor men called me at home on a Sunday to set up a meeting to
      censor me for raising gender issues!. They didn't complain about what
      the women were doing.

      The one male professor encouraged me to get out of teaching by way of
      using the university employment service (a feminist organization.)

      I told them that in every case, I was responding to the women who had
      raised the issues in the first place and that they had to back off. The
      head professor said he would speak with the professors. But, following
      that meeting, my classroom curricula had included one article about
      suicide which mentioned that female depression was 50% higher than male
      depression, but did not mention that male suicide was 400% higher than
      female suicide.

      Another professor issued learning-outcome statements to the class which
      counselled us to include examples of women (and not examples of men).


      Previous to that event, we teacher-students were shown a video of two
      teachers in team teaching. The woman teacher in the video had the line
      assigned to her, "I hope I'm treated as an equal (by the man teacher)"
      and the man teacher was assigned the line, "I'll have to guard against
      my male ego."

      The same female professor who had presented that video had chosen a text
      book which included curricular topics for lesson plans. The topics
      included, "Violence against Women" (and, of course, no concern for
      "Violence against Men").

      During one presentation, a mother of a disabled daughter told how some,
      "ardent Feminist" women had taken her daughter to a male strip joint.
      Such was described by the mother as, "wonderful." Following that, the
      same "ardent Feminist" woman had taken her daughter to the USA to attend
      a Feminist, "woman's music camp" and we were shown a slide of those
      women, many of whom were topless. Evidently lesbianism is encouraged.

      "So, why didn't you complain to officials of the university or
      elsewhere?" My answer is as follows: The student union had a handbook
      which blamed all date violence on men and its front office window had
      three prominently displayed posters about date violence which blamed
      into all on men. Also, annually, the union had taken part in the Marc
      Lepine remembrance day ceremonies at the university...which blamed
      everything on men. As for the university, it had Women's Studies and no
      Men's Studies, and a , "Womyn's Center" and no Men's Center. The,
      poster, "greeting" men to the Womyn's Centre" reads:


      Welcome to the Womyn's Centre

      This is a SAFE PLACE for Womyn

      and Womyn identified people only.

      MEN are asked to KNOCK before entering and to use the space briefly

      Only to access the resources such as: pamphlets, free stuff and books
      in the Library.

      Thank you for your respect and understanding.

      To the above, I can only say, "No thanks for the disrespect and hate."

      Yahoo! Groups Links
    • Show all 27 messages in this topic