149727Re: [evol-psych] Researchers suggest Victorian-era people more intelligent modern-day counterparts [2 Attachments]
- May 18, 2013On 18/05/13 09:10, Anna wrote:
> [Attachment(s) <#TopText> from Anna included below]And had most of her male descendants circumcised, convinced to do so by
> <They back up their claim by suggesting they know the reason for the
> decline in intelligencesmarter people having fewer children, while the
> less smart, have more.>
> Nonsense! Queen Victoria had 9 children!!!
Disraeli, who managed to sell her the idea, that the British Royal
Family was one of lost tribes of Israel.
What won Queen Victoria over, to altering what evolution had designed,
was her first born son, the Prince of Wales, who was a notorious rake.
Having bought this idea from Disraeli, that circumcision tamed 'male'
urges, this practice continued down the male line of succession, until
it reached Prince Charles, who had had around 20,000 nerve endings
disconnected from his limbic system, without his permission as a tiny baby.
Diana his first wife was so horrified at the idea that a knife should be
taken to her perfectly born son's genitals, that she rebelled against
the whole process, I am in ignorance, as to circumcision status of
William and Harry, but suspect that William is, and Harry is not!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>