Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019. Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More
- Dec 14, 2017Thank you Victor and Fritz for a very intelligent exchange.Voegelin's classic analysis of modern gnosticism is still of interest. My analysis of this subject published in 1978 is online in chapter ten of my history of political theory.I wonder if there are any forum members still teaching this subject.Gerhart Niemeyer offered a course on "Modern Ideology" that influenced many of us. And I taught s course modeled on his in a classroom setting and in an Internet course on that subject.I have the impression that this subject was more appreciated by his American students than with his German students.Dick BishirjianOn Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:36 PM, "victorbruno@... [evforum]" <evforum@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Dear Mr. Wagner,Thanks for your welcoming words! I was hoping that no one would see that I am a freshman in the forum.Apart from that, I appreciate your comments. Funny that you mentioned Matthias Reidl work, because in the original Facebook post he actually answered. He mentioned that in his Companion to Joachim of Fiori there is a discussion on Voegelin and Fiore. Reidl claims that Voegelin--although he had not the easy access to Fiore's works as we have--, he had first-hand knowledge of the main works of Fiore in 16th-century copies (such as the Liber de Concordia) and read some minor works through compilations from the experts of the field in his time. Also, as you said, Balthazar's works were a huge influence on his work (I wasn't familiar with Prometheus, I thought his main influence was The Gnostic Religion), as were Mircea Eliade's insights on religion.As I said in the original post, I didn't read Ms. Svenungsson's work entirely--but neither I need. However, I think her remark on Voegelin are ill-thought and irresponsibly. How can she presuppose that he never read any of Fiore's work? Did she visited his library?At any rate, despite my irritation with her lack of knowledge on Dr. Voegelin, at least it inspired me to do some research on Fiore and perhaps write something on the subject.Warmest regards.
---In evforum@yahoogroups.com, <fjjwagner@...> wrote :Welcome to the evforum, Mr. Bruno!
I do not think Voegelin relied on Karl Löwith to supply him with his ideas, though he admired him. Voegelin once related he got his idea about modern gnosticism from Balthazar’s Prometheus, but later felt that the emphasis on gnosticism in his The New Science of Politics (1952) ignored other factors such as neo-Platonism, magic and millenarianism (See the detailed analytical table of contents for the NSP (reproduced in Vol 5 of the Collected Works, where the NSP is now found [of course it is still available as an individual volume from U. of Chicago Press and elsewhere]: http://fritzwagner.com/ev/cw/cw_5_contents.html).Mathias Riedl explored Joachim of Fiore’s writings as far back as the EVS meeting at San Francisco in 2001 and might still offer the best interpretation of what the Franciscan Prior was actually trying to do.You might wish to listen to Voegelin’s own words. He notes that studies of Gnosticism date at least back to the work of Ferdinand Christian Baur’s Chistliche Gnosis of 1835. Voegelin’s noteworthy comment: “. . . Gnosticism and its history [is] a vastly developed science and [the idea] of interpreting contemporary phenomena as Gnostic phenomena is not as original as it may look to the ignoramuses who have criticized me for it.” This is in the taped Autobiographical Reflections. You can listen to it at Part 1o here: https://voegelinview.com/voegelin-audio/ Perhaps this last comment remains valid even today. You might also find Voegelin’s remark on sources interesting: http://www.fritzwagner.com/ev/gnosticism2_source_materials.htmlYou can find a broad assortment of Voegelin quotes by topic here: (http://www.fritzwagner.com/ev/eric_voegelin_table_of_contents.html) or by volume (http://www.fritzwagner.com/ev/eric_voegelin_subject_contents_by_volumes.html)Good luck,Fritz WagnerOn Dec 14, 2017, at 9:36 AM, victorbruno@... [evforum] <evforum@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Friends, is anyone here familiar with Jayne Svenungsson's work DIVINING HISTORY: PROPHETISM, MESSIANISM AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPIRIT? I was looking for something on Google and stumbled upon the attached quote on Voegelin's reading of Joachim de Fiore.
The author is implying that Voegelin did not read Fiore's works, and therefore carelessly labels him as an "early anarchist" (Svenugnsson's words). I would like to bring Ms. Svenungsson's reading of Voegelin to question. If my memory serves me well, I recall that Voegelin rebukes Fiore on his Gnostic pretense to signal the third and final - << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>