Re: Two more fake double-struck 1960-D cents
- The 1960-D and 1963 fake multi-strikes are relatively obvious fakes.
The blending of "first" and "second-strike" design elements is a dead
giveway. A genuine double-strike will show sharp but incomplete
penetration of first-strike design elements through overlapping
second-strike design elements.
There are numerous other red flags, such as the equal strength of the
two "earlier strikes" on the 1960-D cent.
--- In email@example.com, "mrlindy2000"
> Those pix look better than I achieved with my flatbed scanner. The
> 60D and 63 used to be mine. I bought them from Bill Fivaz a decade
> ago or so as fakes. I think he said got them from Del Romines, or
> was it just that Del concured that they were fake. They've been
> studied/owned by a couple of our hobby's error gurus.
> I assume they are contemporary counterfits. "Contemporary" meaning
> they were made to deceive when the dates current.
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Mike Diamond"
> <mdia1@a...> wrote:
> > Here are two more fake multi-strikes:
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3970310459
> > It looks like 1960-D is right behind 1964 in fake double and
> > strikes.