Re: New Discovery Mint Error from Mike Byers
- View SourceThe details are too faint and jumbled for me to count the number of
strikes. I have seen one recent in-collar triple struck dime with
rotation between each strike in which the first strike is still
Given how soft a 91% gold alloy is, I would think striking pressure
would be significantly lower than copper. But I have no data to back
up that assumption.
For clarification as to the nature and origin of the three surface
film effects (surface film doubling, surface film afterimage, surface
film transfer) just type in those keywords into the Search box.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "mrlindy2000"
> I see two strikes, first off center and then a rotated on center
> strike, which is "as described" on the pcgs slab.see
> I think gold requires far more tonnage than copper to strike. Thats
> interesting to me that original o/c details survived 3 more on
> center strikes and not just one. Being a collarless screw press
> struck coin I have no problem with multistrikes to obliterate
> earlier incorrect details to meet the minter's needs that day.
> Unless it was trimmed down with a file, I don't understand why it
> did not expand to a larger diameter due to quadruple striking.
> You're right Diamond, I always get the 2 or 3 surface film titles
> confused. I was thinking the 3rd and 4th strikes, which I cannot
> may have been due to that phenomena since it began as a off center