Re: Superior example of "ejection impact doubling"
- Figure 6 from your article, the picture with 2 extra partial irises,
they are from the same iris but on opposite sides of one another,
okay, that is pretty cool.
I wonder what ejection impact doubling might look like on a silver
eagle? Perhaps this planchet error is one: http://tinyurl.com/9v7br
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Mike Diamond"
> Actually, to see a pdf version of my article, go to the CONECA
> website (www.conecaonline.org) and scroll down the homepage to
> it says "Errorscope Back on Track". Click on the link that saysconsiders
> Jan/Feb issue.
> The article will explain Ejection Impact Doubling and how it is
> unrelated to strike doubling (machine doubling).
> I consider strike doubling a mint error while Alan Herbert
> it damage. Minor strike doubling is common and worth verylittle.
> Major strike doubling is quite uncommon and commands a substantialin
> premium. The Sac dollar you bought had strike doubling that was
> actually "strike tripling", creating two extra sets of design
> elements. Strike doubling that leaves clear and nicely separated
> secondary design elements is rare and a perfectly good mint error,
> my opinion.Diamond"
> There's another error category called "stutter strikes" that is
> different from strike doubling. Here the "secondary" design may
> precede the primary design -- the exact opposite of conventional
> strike doubling. There's a picture in either the "oddball errors"
> or "miscellaneous errors" album. I'll have to check.
> --- In email@example.com, "Mike
> <mdia1@a...> wrote:think
> > Don't sweat it. The hobby as a whole considers it "damage" and
> > the term. I'll send you the text of my article later today.
> > Ejection impact doubling is a new phenomenon, and not covered in
> > Herbert's book (or any book).
> > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Aaron"
> > <darkdesert@h...> wrote:
> > >
> > > sorry, when I said "damage", I just meant some people might
> > inlow
> > > terms like that. Personally, I don't, I bid on a few of these
> > > errors, I think they are interesting. The only reason I bid
> > wasthe
> > > because I didn't know much about them. I was trying to find
> > > article in errorscope online to read more about this type of
> > > doubling.
> > >
> > > also, I remember reading about mechanical doubling in Alan
> > Herbert's
> > > book, I just remember he stressed about doubling caused post
> > > and their values.
> > >
> > > In the past, I have bought a Sac that had tripling on the lips
> > > eyes, paid quite a bit for it (translation, I paid too much).
> > > still unclear about what type of tripling it is?? So anyways,
> > > is an area I need to learn more about.
> > >
> > > Tonight, I will spend some time rereading Herbert's book.
> > >
> > > Aaron