Re: Proof Errors
- The texture is attributed to the steel pellets that proof planchets
are said to be tumbled among.
--- In email@example.com, mdia1@a... wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying this issue for me, Fred. I'm still learning
> willing to learn. It would seem that the pebbly texture on these
> fine, then, rather than coarse. The nickels I'm thinking of have
> coarse texture that's visible from a distance.
> In a message dated 11/1/05 4:47:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> Mike, although the scans may not show it, the surface of the
> blank on ALL Proof errors that I've seen and handled does show
> the "pebbly" surface......those two coins Mike just listed
> also have it, but you can't see it in the scans......
> I'll have to try to get a scan of the 60% Off-Center PROOF
> 1968-S Kennedy that I sold a few years ago, and see if the
> surfaces show up better........
- Thanks for these details, Lindy. I hadn't before heard that the steel shot treatment was applied to non-proof planchets. Did you happen to note the surface texture of the planchets? Did they also have a faintly pocked or pebbly appearance?In a message dated 11/2/05 5:57:41 A.M. Central Standard Time, adkinstone@... writes:
Actually it's a huge vat. I'd say 3' by 3' , stainless steel and
The burnish beads are swirled in the huge vat that also contains the
planchets. The Denver Mint had one in use for the Commemorative
It was very cool to watch the swirling action.
When new, the beads have a distinctly fatter center. When worn they
no longer appear new and they are smaller.
That day, Denver Mint was burinishing silver planchets for their unc
commemoratives. As you know they usually do not strike proofs.