Re: security=safer breaks elvis -client somefile
- * Steve Kirkendall <skirkendall@...> wrote:
> I just discovered that the security=safer setting is too strict.I've played a little bit around with the security option (never used
> I need to think this through, and I'm also hoping that some of
> you can offer comments as well.
it before) and came across a problem:
The manual says about security=safer:
Some commands are allowed only when invoked without a filename
argument. These are :edit, :ex, :file, :open, :push, :split,
:visual, :wquit, and :xit.
However, when I run e.g. 'elvis -S foo' and do :wq, I get the
error message "wquit filename is unsafe" although I didn't supply an
> In other news, I've fixed a surprisingly large number of bugs, andGood news!
> added a basic interface to the gdb debugger.