Re: [elfscript] Re: Plain Letters ("orthographic") Mode of King's Letter
- j_mach_wust wrote:<>
I prefer the r-representation with óre alone (and consequently the
w-representation with rómen) as in DTS 10 and 13.
[Yes, that certainly simplifies matters.]
Danny Andriës wrote (in message #651):
> > > ou, ow = anna + following w signhisilome commented:
> Why not mark "oo" and "ou/ow" with an asterisk? While the assignedMaybe he's confused it with DTS 10 and 13 where we have many instances
> tengwa/tehta combinations certainly seem logical, I cannot find
> these two spellings attested anywhere in the three versions of the
> King's Letter (English part).
of both sounds? I believe there's no problem about using certain
spellings from DTS 10/13 as evidence for the spelling of the King's
Letters and vice versa, since they're basically the same.
<>[I have no problem with doing so either. But Danny Andriës said his
suggestions were based solely on the King's Letter, that's why I was
> Notice also that once (third copy) the "re" in "Shire" is spelt withI'd agree it's a slip-up.
> óre - yanta (but that is probably just a "slip-up").
[BTW, still waiting for somebody's comments on the "R-rule" (if any) in
the Full Mode of Gondor (message 4304):-). Really no pattern at all?]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]