Re: Ómatehtar & Sindarin again
- Calwen Rudh wrote:
> Oh, I'm saved, I can use ómatehtar for Sindarin! JPerhaps our guide for Sindarin answers some of them?
> But still I have some unanswered questions. [...]
Gildir, Per Lindberg
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "gildir_2" <gildir_2@y...> wrote:
> Calwen Rudh wrote:Thanks a lot but I have this one and although I find it very nice,
> > Oh, I'm saved, I can use ómatehtar for Sindarin! J
> > But still I have some unanswered questions. [...]
> Perhaps our guide for Sindarin answers some of them?
> Gildir, Per Lindberg
the tehta mode presented there is based on the KL, as I wrote,
denying the use of calmatéma which I don't agree with. I think that
in a tehta mode, both calmatéma and quessetéma could have been used.
Your overview is counting only with quessetéma as seen in the KL.
I am still wavering about the diphthongs. Some of you advanced say
they are treated as two separate vowels in Tengwar but I have a
different feeling. I think that the diphthongs of KL III are used
also in the tehta mode for Sindarin, BMVHO it could be an interstage
between tehta mode of the First Age (or Second Age) - i.e. diphthong
is transcribed separately - and full writing mode. But it is just a
But you're nice, thanks again.