Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [elfscript] Is this Sindarin correct?

Expand Messages
  • Chris Ruzin
    ... I have changed _en-gûl_ to _istad_ and made the corrections you mentioned above. You can see it now at http://www.chrisruzin.net/images/fearoflord.gif
    Message 1 of 2 , Sep 23, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 01:36 PM, DDanielA@... wrote:
      > That's not quite it.
      >
      > short carrier + single over-dot - númen + triple over-dots & modified
      > u-curl - óre + triple over-dots / hwesta + single over-dot - long
      > carrier + single over-dot - óre / hwesta + single over-dot - rómen +
      > acute accent - short carrier + single over-dot - ando + triple
      > over-dots
      > / ungwe + acute accent & nasal tehta - long carrier + left curl - lambe
      > .
      >
      > According to the examples in the King's Letter, the definite article
      > _i_
      > is never written as a separate word, but as part of the word it
      > modifies. The same would be true of the genitival article _en_. Also,
      > the final rómen before a following vowel rule applies only to the
      > English mode in KL iII; Sindarin final 'r' is always óre in this mode.
      >
      > You might also consider _en-istad_ rather than _en-gûl_ (vide the
      > discussion in another post).

      I have changed _en-gûl_ to _istad_ and made the corrections you
      mentioned above. You can see it now at
      http://www.chrisruzin.net/images/fearoflord.gif

      This looks very nice. This is what I want to get a tattoo of eventually.

      Thanks,
      Chris

      --
      Chris Ruzin
      www.chrisruzin.net

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.