Re: [elfscript] Is this Sindarin correct?
- On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 01:36 PM, DDanielA@... wrote:
> That's not quite it.I have changed _en-gûl_ to _istad_ and made the corrections you
> short carrier + single over-dot - númen + triple over-dots & modified
> u-curl - óre + triple over-dots / hwesta + single over-dot - long
> carrier + single over-dot - óre / hwesta + single over-dot - rómen +
> acute accent - short carrier + single over-dot - ando + triple
> / ungwe + acute accent & nasal tehta - long carrier + left curl - lambe
> According to the examples in the King's Letter, the definite article
> is never written as a separate word, but as part of the word it
> modifies. The same would be true of the genitival article _en_. Also,
> the final rómen before a following vowel rule applies only to the
> English mode in KL iII; Sindarin final 'r' is always óre in this mode.
> You might also consider _en-istad_ rather than _en-gûl_ (vide the
> discussion in another post).
mentioned above. You can see it now at
This looks very nice. This is what I want to get a tattoo of eventually.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]