## Re: [edit+] number patterns...

Expand Messages
• They are number precision indicators: D = double F = float L = long U = unsigned UL = unsigned long E indicates scientific notation eg 4.49e4 = 44900 hence
Message 1 of 3 , Jan 21, 2007
They are number precision indicators:

D = double
F = float
L = long
U = unsigned
UL = unsigned long

E indicates scientific notation eg 4.49e4 = 44900

hence 1EUL might be interpreted as an unsigned long ov value 1e0 ( =1 )

On 21/01/07, Mark Kahn <cwolves@...> wrote:
> does anyone know why these are classified as numbers in editplus (with
> #number_pattern=cpp)
>
> 1D, 1E, 1F, 1L, 1U, 1EUL
>
> whereas these aren't?
>
> 1A, 1B, 1C, etc..., 1ELUL, 1DE
>
> D, E, F, L and U seem to be the only letters that are valid "numbers", but
> only in particular orders....???
>
> -Mark
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> http://www.editplus.com
>
>
>
>
• Hello: Also, the reason the hex numbers you mentioned didn t qualify is because they don t follow the numeric constant standards of C++: Hex numbers must
Message 2 of 3 , Jan 22, 2007
Hello:
Also, the reason the hex numbers you mentioned didn't qualify is
because they don't follow the numeric constant standards of C++: Hex
numbers must begin with 0x and octal with 0. For more information, see

http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/constants.html

dZ.

On Jan 21, 2007, at 19:09, Aleem Juma wrote:

> They are number precision indicators:
>
> D = double
> F = float
> L = long
> U = unsigned
> UL = unsigned long
>
> E indicates scientific notation eg 4.49e4 = 44900
>
> hence 1EUL might be interpreted as an unsigned long ov value 1e0 ( =1 )
>
>
>
> On 21/01/07, Mark Kahn <cwolves@...> wrote:
>> does anyone know why these are classified as numbers in editplus (with
>> #number_pattern=cpp)
>>
>> 1D, 1E, 1F, 1L, 1U, 1EUL
>>
>> whereas these aren't?
>>
>> 1A, 1B, 1C, etc..., 1ELUL, 1DE
>>
>> D, E, F, L and U seem to be the only letters that are valid
>> "numbers", but
>> only in particular orders....???
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.editplus.com