Re: [ebook-community] Digital Poet makes waves
- I think part of the problem is the fact that publishers don't really make
much of an attempt to publish poetry. I'm not sure if they think it's not
economically viable or what, but I think there are plenty of categories of
interest that publishers fail to address, with poetry just being one of
Looking at our Ebook Directory, we only have 65 titles listed. Most of
those we added, and most of those are from 1stBooks/AuthorHouse. That's
pretty sad, considering our EBD represents 13,000+ titles from over 150
publishers. Makes you wonder why they don't address these categories?
Back in 2002, I actually wrote a column about the lack of diversity in ebook
publishing. For those interested, you can find the article at:
David, if you'd like to add your poetry to our Ebook Directory (which is a
free service for all publishers and authors), you can do that at:
Let me know if you'd like to get setup as a publisher to list all of your
KnowBetter.com: For Everything Ebook
----- Original Message -----
From: "davidamerland" <David6379@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 5:56 AM
Subject: [ebook-community] Digital Poet makes waves
> Despite all the ebook activity, original digital poetry has been
> under-represented on the eBook front. We recently tried to address
> the balance with a fresh, exciting, poet called Geoff Tims.
> His work has had some considerable impact on the net. he's been
> interviewed by a number of publications in the UK, appeared on Radio
> Leeds and he's due to appear on Radio London on July 4th.
> His modern poetry book, Deca, has been a success in terms of
> publicity and sales are picking up. Compared to other ebook titles
> however poetry seems to be slow to take off in ebooks. I wonder what
> your experience is of this and whether you think of poetry as a
> viable ebook subject.
> The ebooks we produce are enhanced with extra, interactive sections
> designed to widen the reading experience. To our minds, the very
> exact advantage offered by ebooks is the fact that they can blend,
> seamlessly, web-surfing and paper-reading.
> Poetry, in particular, seems suitable for having on the go rather
> than on a PC. You can dip in and out of it as you like and seems
> particularly suitable for reading in small, manageable chunks.
> I'd be interested in your thoughts on this.
> David Amerland
> Projects Editor
> Cool Publications
- On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Roy Lewis Comcast wrote:
> I have always felt that a Reader in open format was the real problemI'm afraid this has been a heated topic of discussion as long as there
> with the OEBF project. That and a generic open source compiler for
> Now if we could get an open source reader that will recognize all
> formats then real progress can be made with e-books and providing every
> published book in e-book format. As long as you have to purchase a
> specific device to read an e-book then the technology will never move
> forward as it should.
have been eBooks. . .I remember spending HUGE amounts of time converting
the U.S. Constitution from format to format way back before hardly anyone
had heard of eBooks. This file was written in the mid 70's and I converted
it in the early 80's so a wider audience could read it.
But even back then there were hard core people who thought it should only
be made available in their own favorite format, and didn't want their name
on any files in any other formats.
The end result of limited formats and limited distribution is a limited
audience. . .but that is the whole point of many modern business plans.
Years ago I suggested a test that would place two books, perhaps even a b
book and sequel, in both open an closed formats, each for the same price,
and see which brought in more profits.