21003Re: [eCS-Technical] Linux OFMs (was: weaning)
- Dec 4 12:07 PMJan van Wijk composed on 2017-12-04 20:27 (UTC+0100):
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:28:04 +0100 (CET) Maurice GUERON wrote:Me neither. I came from NC on DOS to FC/2 on OS/2 to MC on Linux initially, and
>>Hello Jan, How does MC compare to ZTB alias ZTBold / XTree?
> No idea, it has been 20 years since I uses ZTB I thi k (if it is what I think it is :)
later to FC/L also. I never had any interest in exploring ZTB or XTree.
> I am using MC because it was the closest match to FC/2 :)openSUSE has no currently supported "distribution" in 32bit, but does still
> Will probably switch to FC/Linux now, allthough there only seems to be a 64-bit version
> for Suse, and I think my VM is currently a 32-bit one ...
> Time for a new VM then probably :)
have 32bit in the "rolling release" Tumbleweed.
FC/L only runs in X (requires Pango & Cairo among others). Figuring out which
FC/L to use can be frustrating, but because of
# zypper --no-refresh se -s -i filecom
i+ | filecommander | package | 2.50-svn_1899_centos7 | x86_64 | FCunst
# grep RETT /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Leap 42.3"
I would expect there likely to be a 32bit version compatible with TW, 13.1 &
13.2. IIRC, the FC/ author's Linux personal preference is one of the Debians,
and he doesn't update his web site very often. There is a mailing list for FC:
"Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you
get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>