Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [dxatlas] oddity in MR 1.5

Expand Messages
  • Ian Parsons
    Hehe.. Tnx. Now my head won t hurt so much next time ;) _____ From: dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alex,
    Message 1 of 5 , Jun 5, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      Hehe.. Tnx. Now my head won't hurt so much next time ;)



      _____

      From: dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com]
      On Behalf Of Alex, VE3NEA
      Sent: Sunday, 05 June, 2005 6:27 PM
      To: dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [dxatlas] oddity in MR 1.5



      Hi Ian,

      This is not a bug, he-he...

      If the calling operator thinks that you busted his call, hit F5 (His Call)
      and F3 (TU), no need to re-enter the callsign or re-send the exchange. The
      program remembers the last saved call until you enter a new one.

      73 Alex VE3NEA





      > All,
      >
      > Have any of you experienced this? I wonder if it's possible to go back to
      > an
      > earlier rev., say, 1.4.. .
      >
      > When running a pileup using 1.5, I am frequently running into the
      > following:
      >
      >
      > 1. I call CQ
      > 2. I pick out a station to answer
      > 3. I CORRECTLY copy/enter the call, give the exchange, and hit enter to
      > log
      > 4. The calling station then starts going on as if I've busted his call,
      > and...
      > 5. The only way to stop him from sending is call again and again is to
      > enter
      > it again
      > As though I was answer a new station, give the exchange again, let him
      > say "r"
      > And have to listen to him give his report all over again. At this
      > point I can hit
      > F3 and the "NIL" on the previous line will go away.
      >
      > Is this a flaw or one of Alex's "improvements" to the LIDs feature??
      >
      > I LOVE the adjustable monitor level, although I'd love it even more if it
      > could go one notch lower ;) But with this new and most irritating
      > situation,
      > I'd happily go back to 1.4 (where I never had this issue come up) and sit
      > there with the phones halfway off my head :)
      >
      > 'zm
      >
      > --
      > Parsons... Ian Parsons




      _____

      Yahoo! Groups Links

      * To visit your group on the web, go to:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxatlas_group/

      * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      dxatlas_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      <mailto:dxatlas_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

      * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
      <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Michael Pfeuffer
      You re evil. I like it. :) Now, if we could just customize the keys to match different contesting programs... 73! --Mike WQ5C
      Message 2 of 5 , Jun 5, 2005
      • 0 Attachment
        You're evil. I like it. :)

        Now, if we could just customize the keys to match different contesting
        programs...

        73!
        --Mike WQ5C



        At 08:27 PM 6/5/2005, Alex, VE3NEA wrote:
        >Hi Ian,
        >
        >This is not a bug, he-he...
        >
        >If the calling operator thinks that you busted his call, hit F5 (His Call)
        >and F3 (TU), no need to re-enter the callsign or re-send the exchange. The
        >program remembers the last saved call until you enter a new one.
        >
        >73 Alex VE3NEA
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > > All,
        > >
        > > Have any of you experienced this? I wonder if it's possible to go back to
        > > an
        > > earlier rev., say, 1.4.. .
        > >
        > > When running a pileup using 1.5, I am frequently running into the
        > > following:
        > >
        > >
        > > 1. I call CQ
        > > 2. I pick out a station to answer
        > > 3. I CORRECTLY copy/enter the call, give the exchange, and hit enter to
        > > log
        > > 4. The calling station then starts going on as if I've busted his call,
        > > and...
        > > 5. The only way to stop him from sending is call again and again is to
        > > enter
        > > it again
        > > As though I was answer a new station, give the exchange again, let him
        > > say "r"
        > > And have to listen to him give his report all over again. At this
        > > point I can hit
        > > F3 and the "NIL" on the previous line will go away.
        > >
        > > Is this a flaw or one of Alex's "improvements" to the LIDs feature??
        > >
        > > I LOVE the adjustable monitor level, although I'd love it even more if it
        > > could go one notch lower ;) But with this new and most irritating
        > > situation,
        > > I'd happily go back to 1.4 (where I never had this issue come up) and sit
        > > there with the phones halfway off my head :)
        > >
        > > 'zm
        > >
        > > --
        > > Parsons... Ian Parsons
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >Yahoo! Groups Links
        >
        >
        >
        >
      • Alex, VE3NEA
        Hi Mike, You have yet to see some other evil tricks MR has learned :-) For example, in the new version the op does NOT always correct you if you bust the call.
        Message 3 of 5 , Jun 5, 2005
        • 0 Attachment
          Hi Mike,

          You have yet to see some other evil tricks MR has learned :-) For example,
          in the new version the op does NOT always correct you if you bust the call.
          Guessing callsigns is now dangerous, like in the real world.

          Perhaps I can make the mapping between the F keys and the messages
          configurable, but I cannot allow editing the message text. Remember that
          there are not human operators behind the calling stations. The program can
          copy what you send, but it cannot understand what the message means, it just
          checks which F key you pressed. When I figure out how to write a program
          that understands free format messages, I will probably create a robot that
          will work in the contests for me ;-)

          73 Alex VE3NEA






          > You're evil. I like it. :)
          >
          > Now, if we could just customize the keys to match different contesting
          > programs...
          >
          > 73!
          > --Mike WQ5C
          >
          >
          >
          > At 08:27 PM 6/5/2005, Alex, VE3NEA wrote:
          >>Hi Ian,
          >>
          >>This is not a bug, he-he...
          >>
          >>If the calling operator thinks that you busted his call, hit F5 (His Call)
          >>and F3 (TU), no need to re-enter the callsign or re-send the exchange. The
          >>program remembers the last saved call until you enter a new one.
          >>
          >>73 Alex VE3NEA
        • Gary Hinson
          Alex, Entering European Field Day the weekend just past led me to think about my top twenty examples of incompetent contestants that you might like to simulate
          Message 4 of 5 , Jun 7, 2005
          • 0 Attachment
            Alex,

            Entering European Field Day the weekend just past led me to think about my
            top twenty examples of incompetent contestants that you might like to
            simulate in Morse Runner. This is - unfortunately - only a partial list:

            1) Alligators (all mouth, no ears) who either hear nothing at all or ask for
            repeats, sometimes more than once, sometimes once more ...

            2) Touch-typos who get our call wrong (and sometimes refuse to acknowledge
            the call correction), and occasionally get their own call wrong, forget the
            /P, send the wrong serial number (any digit wrong)

            3) Sonically-challenged lids who start calling CQ on 'our' frequency with no
            QRL?, or who are selectively deaf if we respond to the QRL? with anything at
            all (you've got those already Alex, but how about letting us tell them to
            QSY, or QSY ourselves a bit to slide out of trouble, if there is room to
            move without colliding with someone else?)

            4) Squinters - off-channel callers (MR does this well already, but sometimes
            they move frequency between overs to keep us on our toes!)

            5) Red Zone callers who push the rig and amp to the very limits of
            performance and often well beyond. Their sigs are as far from perfect sine
            waves as it is possible to get. Raspy T1 notes, drifty wanderers,
            multiple-tones, we hear the lot in every Field Day and many fixed contests
            too, so it's not all down to battery power.

            6) Dupes we've already worked already. We have already worked them. We
            have worked them before. But still they keep calling back.
            6a) Phantom Dupes who claim we've worked before, but haven't (often because
            of a busted QSO) ... and yes, this includes those who answer our CQs
            6b) Phantom Dupes who want to correct the serial number they gave us one or
            two QSOs ago [Alex, is it too difficult to be able to move the cursor up a
            few QSOs to correct the log? Doing this well without messing up the QSO in
            progress is another hard-won contesting skill.]

            7) Me Me's who try to complete a QSO even when we are quite clearly and
            adamantly working someone else, causing loads of QRM

            8) Tone Deaf tuner-uppers who choose 'our' frequency to try to melt their PA
            valves

            9) QRPers and DX callers who specialise in drifting vaguely around the noise
            floor

            10) Meter-misers whose electricity runs out half way through a QSO and
            suddenly go QRT (maybe to re-fill the generator?) leaving us hanging ...

            11) CBers who want to tell us their name, rig, QSL info and so forth, and
            have no idea we are in a contest, nor what a contest is

            12) Slotters who want us to QSY and work them on another band, often when
            there is no propagation

            13) Zero Beaters who call at exactly the same time and frequency as each
            other on each over

            14) QLFs who send dots, dashes and other indeterminate bits and gaps in a
            random sequence not resembling any known Morse characters

            15) Repeaters who send their calls several times, and sometimes our call too
            for good measure

            16) Autobiographers who seem to want tell me their entire life stories:
            "G4iFB DE M0LID - TNX RPRT OM - UR RST 599 5NN 599 - OP HERE SIMON SIMON -
            QTH BIGGINSWADE - WX WET AND WINDY - GL IN CONTEST ..."

            17) Life's-too-shorters who don't leave gapsbetweenwords, and even worse
            don't leave gaps between charactrz because it saves a few milliseconds

            18) Gadget-boys who love to send 5NN and TEST at a zillion wpm but can't
            receive at the same speed

            19) Strokers who try all possible variations of bits and spaces in a
            desperate attempt to send /P [after too few hours sleep, I'm usually in this
            category myself by Sunday morning!]

            20) Breakers on QSK who drop bits into our stream in an attempt to stop us
            sending, but then get all mixed up when we actually stop for them

            One thing I've noticed in MR but almost never in Real Life is that if we
            send a partial call but the real caller doesn't respond, MR leaves us
            hanging in silence, listening to white noise, QRM and QRN. In Real Live,
            usually, someone else will jump in to any gap within a short while with
            their own call, even though it bears no relation to the partial. They
            usually call during the first quiet period more than a few milliseconds
            long, and almost always it's a complete free-for-all on the second partial
            attempt (as if we have just called CQ all over again). Usually a "?" will
            coax them out of hiding if it all goes quiet, but not in MR.

            But the biggest request of all, Alex, is for a new mode: S&P
            (search-and-pounce). I suspect even the biggest of monster stations with
            the most exotic callsigns don't CQ all the time but need to hunt around for
            new mults etc. from time to time. There's definitely an art to S&P
            efficiently. I have in mind a QSY facility that works just like the
            'tuneable IF' idea you already have, perhaps, or else a pair of QSY up/down
            buttons. Then we can zero beat on people calling CQ and try to work them.

            My trusty old Morse Machine runs the Doctor DX program to simulate contests.
            It lets you change bands, and makes a reasonable attempt to change the
            callers to reflect the different propagation on each band ... This maybe
            just a bit sophisticated for free MR but it's maybe another idea to
            consider.

            With all those wish-list items off my mind, let me just say that I am not
            trying to overload the poor programmer and certainly don't expect to see
            these wishes met unless others agree. Most of all, I would hate to
            compromise MR's beautifully realistic audio simulation that beats any other
            morse sim I have *ever* used hands-down. And all this for free! Alex,
            you're a star.

            73
            Gary
            G4iFB (also the weaker half of G3GRS/P and an insignificant element of M6T
            GW8GT G0FBB/P XT2DX GJ2A etc. etc.)


            [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
          Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.