Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [dxatlas] faros - very long delay time?

Expand Messages
  • Jerry Flanders
    Looks like my own posts are OK. This last post is stamped 6:30 on my screen. My wife tells me I am slow sometimes - maybe that is the problem. Jerry W4UK
    Message 1 of 16 , Mar 5, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Looks like my own posts are OK.

      This last post is stamped 6:30 on my screen.

      My wife tells me I am "slow" sometimes - maybe that is the problem.

      Jerry W4UK

      At 03:35 PM 3/5/2010, you wrote:
      >Strange! My PC clock is correct, as is my time zone. I am about to
      >send this at 3:35 according to the PC. I will have to see what is
      >going on. Thanks for the tip.
      >
      >Jerry W4UK
      >
      >
      >At 06:30 PM 3/5/2010, you wrote:
      > >Your message below is reporting my earlier response as time stamped at
      > >"5:28 PM"! What is that all about?
      > >
      > >Bruce
      > >----------------
      > >
      > >On 3/5/2010 11:52 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Yes - that could be the problem ;-)
      > > >
      > > > Or maybe other factors as well.
      > > >
      > > > Anybody have any other ideas?
      > > >
      > > > Jerry W4UK
      > > >
      > > > At 05:28 PM 3/5/2010, you wrote:
      > > > >Wow! I don't know if this is of any value or significance to the issue,
      > > > >Jerry, but I have heard that an effect of the recent Earthquake in Chile
      > > > >there scientists have been able to record both a very minor change in
      > > > >the tilt of the Earth on her axis and a very slight speed up (I think)
      > > > >of the period of rotation. Could that be showing up in the Faros data?
      > > > >The Chilean earthquake was about two weeks ago now, Feb. 27.
      > > > >
      > > > >Ref:
      > > > >http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
      > > >
      > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>
      > > > >
      > > > >There are other reports if you Google 'earthquake rotation axis'.
      > > > >
      > > > >Bruce, K2BET
      > > > >-------------------
      > > > >
      > > > >On 3/5/2010 8:02 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Faros was running FB until a couple weeks ago, with almost all delays
      > > > > > on the short path line as expected. Now delays appear to be in the
      > > > > > range of 200 - 300 ms and all delay points are at top of details
      > > > screen.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > I can't find any setting that appears wrong to me. I have uninstalled
      > > > > > and reinstalled Faros - no help.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Current settings:
      > > > > > Signal delay red vertical line is about 17 ms with a "normal" (no pun
      > > > > > intended) distribution of green lines centering at about 15 ms,
      > > > > > extending from about 0 to about 46 ms.
      > > > > > Delay correction is set to 17 ms.
      > > > > > UTC Clock info std error 0.99 ms, max error 18.6 ms.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Log file shows even high SNR stations are recording delays of 200 -
      > > > > > 300 ms.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Any ideas?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Jerry W4UK
      > > > > >
      > > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >------------------------------------
      > > > >
      > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > >
      > >
      > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >------------------------------------
      > >
      > >Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
      >------------------------------------
      >
      >Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
    • Ted Roycraft
      Oh, please!!!!! And maybe Venus is going to come out of its orbit and collide with the Earth. Ted, W2ZK ... [Non-text portions of this message have been
      Message 2 of 16 , Mar 5, 2010
      • 0 Attachment
        Oh, please!!!!! And maybe Venus is going to come out of its orbit and
        collide with the Earth.

        Ted, W2ZK

        On 3/5/2010 5:28 PM, Bruce Tanner wrote:
        >
        > Wow! I don't know if this is of any value or significance to the issue,
        > Jerry, but I have heard that an effect of the recent Earthquake in Chile
        > there scientists have been able to record both a very minor change in
        > the tilt of the Earth on her axis and a very slight speed up (I think)
        > of the period of rotation. Could that be showing up in the Faros data?
        > The Chilean earthquake was about two weeks ago now, Feb. 27.
        >
        > Ref:
        > http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
        > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>
        >
        > There are other reports if you Google 'earthquake rotation axis'.
        >
        > Bruce, K2BET
        > -------------------
        >
        > On 3/5/2010 8:02 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
        > >
        > > Faros was running FB until a couple weeks ago, with almost all delays
        > > on the short path line as expected. Now delays appear to be in the
        > > range of 200 - 300 ms and all delay points are at top of details screen.
        > >
        > > I can't find any setting that appears wrong to me. I have uninstalled
        > > and reinstalled Faros - no help.
        > >
        > > Current settings:
        > > Signal delay red vertical line is about 17 ms with a "normal" (no pun
        > > intended) distribution of green lines centering at about 15 ms,
        > > extending from about 0 to about 46 ms.
        > > Delay correction is set to 17 ms.
        > > UTC Clock info std error 0.99 ms, max error 18.6 ms.
        > >
        > > Log file shows even high SNR stations are recording delays of 200 -
        > > 300 ms.
        > >
        > > Any ideas?
        > >
        > > Jerry W4UK
        > >
        > >
        >
        > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        >
        >


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      • Dave
        Hi Ted- It really happened. And has happened. No much, but, yes, a bit of a change. Made the day longer by milliseconds. Faros might not detect it, but other
        Message 3 of 16 , Mar 5, 2010
        • 0 Attachment
          Hi Ted- It really happened. And has happened. No much, but, yes, a bit of a
          change. Made the day longer by milliseconds.
          Faros might not detect it, but other instruments did.

          Dave Mynatt
          /====================================/
          http://sciencecenter.no-ip.org
          SID ID #S-0258
          APRS Tier II Server @ http://pueblo.aprs2.net:14501
          10 meter CW Beacon @ 28.2345 Mhz
          RMS Server: 144.950 Mhz // KA0SWT-10
          Echolink Server Node: 473082 @147.480Mhz Simplex KA0SWT-L
          LAT: (38.15.49) 38.26349"N LON: (104.36.48) -104.613297"W Alt: 1460m
          DM78qg // KA0SWT
          /++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++/





          -----Original Message-----
          From: dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com]
          On Behalf Of Ted Roycraft
          Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 14:04
          To: dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [dxatlas] faros - very long delay time?

          Oh, please!!!!! And maybe Venus is going to come out of its orbit and
          collide with the Earth.

          Ted, W2ZK

          On 3/5/2010 5:28 PM, Bruce Tanner wrote:
          >
          > Wow! I don't know if this is of any value or significance to the
          > issue, Jerry, but I have heard that an effect of the recent Earthquake
          > in Chile there scientists have been able to record both a very minor
          > change in the tilt of the Earth on her axis and a very slight speed up
          > (I think) of the period of rotation. Could that be showing up in the Faros
          data?
          > The Chilean earthquake was about two weeks ago now, Feb. 27.
          >
          > Ref:
          > http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar
          > 04
          > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010ma
          > r04>
          >
          > There are other reports if you Google 'earthquake rotation axis'.
          >
          > Bruce, K2BET
          > -------------------
          >
          > On 3/5/2010 8:02 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
          > >
          > > Faros was running FB until a couple weeks ago, with almost all
          > > delays on the short path line as expected. Now delays appear to be
          > > in the range of 200 - 300 ms and all delay points are at top of details
          screen.
          > >
          > > I can't find any setting that appears wrong to me. I have
          > > uninstalled and reinstalled Faros - no help.
          > >
          > > Current settings:
          > > Signal delay red vertical line is about 17 ms with a "normal" (no
          > > pun
          > > intended) distribution of green lines centering at about 15 ms,
          > > extending from about 0 to about 46 ms.
          > > Delay correction is set to 17 ms.
          > > UTC Clock info std error 0.99 ms, max error 18.6 ms.
          > >
          > > Log file shows even high SNR stations are recording delays of 200 -
          > > 300 ms.
          > >
          > > Any ideas?
          > >
          > > Jerry W4UK
          > >
          > >
          >
          > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
          >
          >


          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



          ------------------------------------

          Yahoo! Groups Links




          ----------


          No virus found in this outgoing message.
          Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
          Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2724 - Release Date: 03/05/10 13:26:00


          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        • Dave
          Check the mail server. Dave Mynatt /====================================/ http://sciencecenter.no-ip.org SID ID #S-0258 APRS Tier II Server @
          Message 4 of 16 , Mar 5, 2010
          • 0 Attachment
            Check the mail server.


            Dave Mynatt
            /====================================/
            http://sciencecenter.no-ip.org
            SID ID #S-0258
            APRS Tier II Server @ http://pueblo.aprs2.net:14501
            10 meter CW Beacon @ 28.2345 Mhz
            RMS Server: 144.950 Mhz // KA0SWT-10
            Echolink Server Node: 473082 @147.480Mhz Simplex KA0SWT-L
            LAT: (38.15.49) 38.26349"N LON: (104.36.48) -104.613297"W Alt: 1460m
            DM78qg // KA0SWT
            /++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++/





            -----Original Message-----
            From: dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com]
            On Behalf Of Bruce Tanner
            Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 16:30
            To: dxatlas_group@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: Re: [dxatlas] faros - very long delay time?

            Your message below is reporting my earlier response as time stamped at
            "5:28 PM"! What is that all about?

            Bruce
            ----------------

            On 3/5/2010 11:52 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
            >
            > Yes - that could be the problem ;-)
            >
            > Or maybe other factors as well.
            >
            > Anybody have any other ideas?
            >
            > Jerry W4UK
            >
            > At 05:28 PM 3/5/2010, you wrote:
            > >Wow! I don't know if this is of any value or significance to the
            > >issue, Jerry, but I have heard that an effect of the recent
            > >Earthquake in Chile there scientists have been able to record both a
            > >very minor change in the tilt of the Earth on her axis and a very
            > >slight speed up (I think) of the period of rotation. Could that be
            showing up in the Faros data?
            > >The Chilean earthquake was about two weeks ago now, Feb. 27.
            > >
            > >Ref:
            > >http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010ma
            > >r04
            > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010ma
            > r04>
            > >
            > >There are other reports if you Google 'earthquake rotation axis'.
            > >
            > >Bruce, K2BET
            > >-------------------
            > >
            > >On 3/5/2010 8:02 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
            > > >
            > > > Faros was running FB until a couple weeks ago, with almost all
            > > > delays on the short path line as expected. Now delays appear to be
            > > > in the range of 200 - 300 ms and all delay points are at top of
            > > > details
            > screen.
            > > >
            > > > I can't find any setting that appears wrong to me. I have
            > > > uninstalled and reinstalled Faros - no help.
            > > >
            > > > Current settings:
            > > > Signal delay red vertical line is about 17 ms with a "normal" (no
            > > > pun
            > > > intended) distribution of green lines centering at about 15 ms,
            > > > extending from about 0 to about 46 ms.
            > > > Delay correction is set to 17 ms.
            > > > UTC Clock info std error 0.99 ms, max error 18.6 ms.
            > > >
            > > > Log file shows even high SNR stations are recording delays of 200
            > > > - 300 ms.
            > > >
            > > > Any ideas?
            > > >
            > > > Jerry W4UK
            > > >
            > > >
            > >
            > >
            > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >------------------------------------
            > >
            > >Yahoo! Groups Links
            > >
            > >
            > >
            >
            >


            [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



            ------------------------------------

            Yahoo! Groups Links




            ----------


            No virus found in this outgoing message.
            Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
            Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2724 - Release Date: 03/05/10 13:26:00


            [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
          • Bruce Tanner
            PS: The Earth didn t tilt that much!! ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            Message 5 of 16 , Mar 5, 2010
            • 0 Attachment
              PS: The Earth didn't tilt that much!!

              :)

              On 3/5/2010 3:30 PM, Bruce Tanner wrote:
              >
              > Your message below is reporting my earlier response as time stamped at
              > "5:28 PM"! What is that all about?
              >
              > Bruce
              > ----------------
              >
              > On 3/5/2010 11:52 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
              > >
              > > Yes - that could be the problem ;-)
              > >
              > > Or maybe other factors as well.
              > >
              > > Anybody have any other ideas?
              > >
              > > Jerry W4UK
              > >
              > > At 05:28 PM 3/5/2010, you wrote:
              > > >Wow! I don't know if this is of any value or significance to the issue,
              > > >Jerry, but I have heard that an effect of the recent Earthquake in
              > Chile
              > > >there scientists have been able to record both a very minor change in
              > > >the tilt of the Earth on her axis and a very slight speed up (I think)
              > > >of the period of rotation. Could that be showing up in the Faros data?
              > > >The Chilean earthquake was about two weeks ago now, Feb. 27.
              > > >
              > > >Ref:
              > >
              > >http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
              > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>
              >
              > >
              > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
              > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>>
              > > >
              > > >There are other reports if you Google 'earthquake rotation axis'.
              > > >
              > > >Bruce, K2BET
              > > >-------------------
              > > >
              > > >On 3/5/2010 8:02 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
              > > > >
              > > > > Faros was running FB until a couple weeks ago, with almost all
              > delays
              > > > > on the short path line as expected. Now delays appear to be in the
              > > > > range of 200 - 300 ms and all delay points are at top of details
              > > screen.
              > > > >
              > > > > I can't find any setting that appears wrong to me. I have
              > uninstalled
              > > > > and reinstalled Faros - no help.
              > > > >
              > > > > Current settings:
              > > > > Signal delay red vertical line is about 17 ms with a "normal"
              > (no pun
              > > > > intended) distribution of green lines centering at about 15 ms,
              > > > > extending from about 0 to about 46 ms.
              > > > > Delay correction is set to 17 ms.
              > > > > UTC Clock info std error 0.99 ms, max error 18.6 ms.
              > > > >
              > > > > Log file shows even high SNR stations are recording delays of 200 -
              > > > > 300 ms.
              > > > >
              > > > > Any ideas?
              > > > >
              > > > > Jerry W4UK
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > >
              > > >
              > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
              > > >
              > > >
              > > >
              > > >------------------------------------
              > > >
              > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
              > > >
              > > >
              > > >
              > >
              > >
              >
              > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
              >
              >


              [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            • Bruce Tanner
              test message ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
              Message 6 of 16 , Mar 5, 2010
              • 0 Attachment
                test message

                On 3/5/2010 6:41 PM, Bruce Tanner wrote:
                >
                > PS: The Earth didn't tilt that much!!
                >
                > :)
                >
                > On 3/5/2010 3:30 PM, Bruce Tanner wrote:
                > >
                > > Your message below is reporting my earlier response as time stamped at
                > > "5:28 PM"! What is that all about?
                > >
                > > Bruce
                > > ----------------
                > >
                > > On 3/5/2010 11:52 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
                > > >
                > > > Yes - that could be the problem ;-)
                > > >
                > > > Or maybe other factors as well.
                > > >
                > > > Anybody have any other ideas?
                > > >
                > > > Jerry W4UK
                > > >
                > > > At 05:28 PM 3/5/2010, you wrote:
                > > > >Wow! I don't know if this is of any value or significance to the
                > issue,
                > > > >Jerry, but I have heard that an effect of the recent Earthquake in
                > > Chile
                > > > >there scientists have been able to record both a very minor change in
                > > > >the tilt of the Earth on her axis and a very slight speed up (I
                > think)
                > > > >of the period of rotation. Could that be showing up in the Faros
                > data?
                > > > >The Chilean earthquake was about two weeks ago now, Feb. 27.
                > > > >
                > > > >Ref:
                > > >
                > >
                > >http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
                > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>
                >
                > >
                > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
                > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>>
                >
                > >
                > > >
                > >
                > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
                > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>
                >
                > >
                > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
                > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>>>
                > > > >
                > > > >There are other reports if you Google 'earthquake rotation axis'.
                > > > >
                > > > >Bruce, K2BET
                > > > >-------------------
                > > > >
                > > > >On 3/5/2010 8:02 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Faros was running FB until a couple weeks ago, with almost all
                > > delays
                > > > > > on the short path line as expected. Now delays appear to be in the
                > > > > > range of 200 - 300 ms and all delay points are at top of details
                > > > screen.
                > > > > >
                > > > > > I can't find any setting that appears wrong to me. I have
                > > uninstalled
                > > > > > and reinstalled Faros - no help.
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Current settings:
                > > > > > Signal delay red vertical line is about 17 ms with a "normal"
                > > (no pun
                > > > > > intended) distribution of green lines centering at about 15 ms,
                > > > > > extending from about 0 to about 46 ms.
                > > > > > Delay correction is set to 17 ms.
                > > > > > UTC Clock info std error 0.99 ms, max error 18.6 ms.
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Log file shows even high SNR stations are recording delays of
                > 200 -
                > > > > > 300 ms.
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Any ideas?
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Jerry W4UK
                > > > > >
                > > > > >
                > > > >
                > > > >
                > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                > > > >
                > > > >
                > > > >
                > > > >------------------------------------
                > > > >
                > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
                > > > >
                > > > >
                > > > >
                > > >
                > > >
                > >
                > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                > >
                > >
                >
                > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                >
                >


                [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
              • Dave Baxter
                Hi... When you did a re-install, did you clean out (after backing up) all the old data? Only ask, as what you see in the delay statistics, may be from the
                Message 7 of 16 , Mar 8, 2010
                • 0 Attachment
                  Hi...

                  When you did a re-install, did you clean out (after backing up) all the
                  old data?

                  Only ask, as what you see in the delay statistics, may be from the prior
                  install, if you just installed over the old one.

                  It's always worth clearing that data in the app, then letting the system
                  gather new data for a day or so, before deciding what's going on. You
                  may find a new peak in the data up in the 100's of mS as a result.

                  If so....

                  Check your NTP time source(s). It's not unknown for ISP's to do silly
                  things, like decide to take a NTP server off the public access list, or
                  to move the service to another system that varies so much as to make it
                  useless for apps'a like Faros.

                  Faros is also "a little unkind" to NTP servers too I've been told, due
                  to the poll rate it uses, from prolonged discussions on a NTP newsgroup
                  with people who are "in the know" re these things.
                  (comp.protocols.time.ntp)

                  I've ended up (for several reasons) creating my own local (on my LAN)
                  NTP server, locked to GPS time, just like the beacons themselves. Not
                  a trivial task as it turned out, but I started doing that based on this
                  page. http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-serial-port.html

                  There's a lot to read, and even then, it's not exactly a "how to" as to
                  do it. But I can help there if needed. It does work, and works very
                  well indeed, even running on Windows! More than good enough for Faros.

                  Even without the GPS locking, a local NTP server on your LAN (even
                  running in the background on an existing box) will service Faros just
                  fine, and only sync periodicaly with external NTP sources, if you still
                  have a good one or three to use.

                  However... If your ISP or WAN provider is messing about, and the ping
                  times to the servers vary significantly throught the day (as mine were
                  doing) then you *need* the local GPS locked type of NTP source.

                  Most ISP's sadly will be happy if their NTP servers are within 1S of
                  each other, let alone within mS (or better) of UTC ticks. Contact them
                  to complain about jitter and huge offsets, and if you find someone who
                  doesnt think you're talking about FTP, they still wont have a clue what
                  you're on about.

                  Hope you find out what and why, and it's not NTP issues. Resolvable if
                  that is the case, but it's a bit of a chore. Help available if needed.

                  Regards.

                  Dave G0WBX.
                • Bruce Tanner
                  Jerry, an interesting article I just noticed that might pertain to this issue. A project worth following, I think. If NASA is concerned why not FAROS!?
                  Message 8 of 16 , Mar 11, 2010
                  • 0 Attachment
                    Jerry, an interesting article I just noticed that might pertain to this
                    issue. A project worth following, I think. If NASA is concerned why not
                    FAROS!?

                    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2010/11mar_figureaxis.htm

                    Bruce

                    -----------------------
                    On 3/5/2010 5:28 PM, Bruce Tanner wrote:
                    >
                    > Wow! I don't know if this is of any value or significance to the issue,
                    > Jerry, but I have heard that an effect of the recent Earthquake in Chile
                    > there scientists have been able to record both a very minor change in
                    > the tilt of the Earth on her axis and a very slight speed up (I think)
                    > of the period of rotation. Could that be showing up in the Faros data?
                    > The Chilean earthquake was about two weeks ago now, Feb. 27.
                    >
                    > Ref:
                    > http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04
                    > <http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-lost-time4-2010mar04>
                    >
                    > There are other reports if you Google 'earthquake rotation axis'.
                    >
                    > Bruce, K2BET
                    > -------------------
                    >
                    > On 3/5/2010 8:02 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
                    > >
                    > > Faros was running FB until a couple weeks ago, with almost all delays
                    > > on the short path line as expected. Now delays appear to be in the
                    > > range of 200 - 300 ms and all delay points are at top of details screen.
                    > >
                    > > I can't find any setting that appears wrong to me. I have uninstalled
                    > > and reinstalled Faros - no help.
                    > >
                    > > Current settings:
                    > > Signal delay red vertical line is about 17 ms with a "normal" (no pun
                    > > intended) distribution of green lines centering at about 15 ms,
                    > > extending from about 0 to about 46 ms.
                    > > Delay correction is set to 17 ms.
                    > > UTC Clock info std error 0.99 ms, max error 18.6 ms.
                    > >
                    > > Log file shows even high SNR stations are recording delays of 200 -
                    > > 300 ms.
                    > >
                    > > Any ideas?
                    > >
                    > > Jerry W4UK
                    > >
                    > >
                    >
                    > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                    >
                    >


                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.