1139Re: [dxatlas] Re: CW Skimmer 1.3
- Nov 3, 2008Hi Jerry,
If you set up CW Skimmer on IF, this is not going to be a small return, this
will be a breakthrough that will radically change your DXing. This is not
just a theory, I know this from my own experience. I used a 3-kHz waterfall
display for a couple of years. I had a modest homebrew antenna and 100W, and
the waterfall helped me to crack small pileups, but I would not even bother
to call real DX in the 10+kHz pileups since I knew I had no chances to work
Everything changed when I put a SoftRock on the IF of my Kenwood TS-570
three years ago. Now I could see the whole pileup, no matter how big it was.
I still had my homebrew antenna and no PA, but I started to work the most
rare DX on a regular basis. I worked 3Y0X within an our after they appeared
on the bands for the first time, when the whole world was chasing them for a
new one. I worked two VU4's and both VU7 stations, though this was not easy.
FT5XO, 9N7JO and ZL9BSJ/P were a piece of cake, I worked them on the second
or third call. In total, I worked 292 DXCC entities in the 4 years of low
sunspots - I think I would work only half of that without the Skimmer.
The wideband waterfall was the key to success in cracking the big pileups.
By looking at the dots and dashes of the calling stations, I always knew
where the DX was listening, and could see the gaps in the pileup. I just
waited until the DX operator tunes his receiver at a clear frequency, and
called him there.
Cracking the pileups is one thing, but finding the DX before the pileup
develops is equally important. CW Skimmer is very useful in this respect. If
you can see a wide slice of the band, you have excellent chances of
discovering the DX when he sends his first CQ. That's how I worked SV2ASP/A
in CW. The waterfall alone was not enough for that though. I did my
homework, and I knew when and where to listen for Monk Apollo, but the
waterfall helped me to be the first to discover his signal when he finally
appeared on the band.
I hope now you understand why I highly recommend the wideband approach and
discourage the users from using the Skimmer in the narrowband mode, except
for the initial testing of the software. The advantages of the wideband mode
are so huge that they justify any amount of work required to set up a
73 Alex VE3NEA
----- Original Message -----
Not yet, I'm thinking about a couple of paths that I could go in....
including LP-PAN. But as you say.... a lot of complexity for what
might be a small return. I use CW Skimmer to help me level the playing
field when chasing DX running split. Generally the most bandwidth I
would ever use would be 10 kHz. As it is 3 kHz works maybe 60% of the
time with just a little bit of VFO movement.
One of these days I'll take the Orion apart and install a 9MHz buffer
amp on the IF with an output on the back panel, then I'll have the
flexibility to try different approaches.... until then 3 kHz will have
Oh, you didn't comment on the selecting VFOs...
Thanks for the speedy reply.
73, Jerry, KG6TT
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>