Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

IS OBAMA, KERRY,& BIDEN REALLY DUMB AS AN OX PER SYRIA?

Expand Messages
  • nathaniel x vance
    Dear Group, How complicated is complicated? If you choose to peruse this recent ZT excerpt, you may end up asking yourself the same awe-inspiring question that
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 8, 2013
    Dear Group,
    How complicated is complicated? If you choose to peruse this recent ZT excerpt, you may end up asking yourself the same awe-inspiring question that others likewise have asked, and that is…
    Is Obama and Biden and Kerry [really] playing a game, appearing to be as dumb as an ox about the “evidence” they have that Assad did it? 
     
    Thanks
    -
    ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for September 7, 2013
    Questioners:
    I read the zeta talk about The Syria situation.  Even though Israel conducted the chemical weapon attack, why was Obama so gung ho about attacking Syria?  And why does he still want to attack Syria?  I know he doesn't like Israel but why does he want to support them now? [and from another] I read in the newspaper yesterday (August 31 2013) that it would take approximately 3 weeks for the UN inspectors to publicize their results on the attack with chemical weapons. The Zetas stated in the latest Zetatalk that the announcement about the passage of Nibiru will happen at the time when the governments will announce that the attack was a false flag, caused by rebels. I was amazed by this hint on the announcement (hoping I interpreted it correctly). So, combining these two messages, I believe we'll have to 'buckle up' either the weekend of the 21 or the 28th of September at the latest. [and from another] http://www.mintpressnews.com/witnesses-of-gas-attack-say-saudis-supplied-rebels-with-chemical-weapons/168135/  Dale Gavlak is a Middle East correspondent for Mint Press News and has reported from Amman, Jordan, writing for the Associated Press, NPR and BBC. As the machinery for a U.S.-led military intervention in Syria gathers pace following last week’s chemical weapons attack, the U.S. and its allies may be targeting the wrong culprit. Interviews with people in Damascus and Ghouta, a suburb of the Syrian capital, where the humanitarian agency Doctors Without Borders said at least 355 people had died last week from what it believed to be a neurotoxic agent, appear to indicate as much. Ghouta townspeople said the rebels were using mosques and private houses to sleep while storing their weapons in tunnels. In a recent article for Business Insider, reporter Geoffrey Ingersoll highlighted Saudi Prince Bandar’s role in the two-and-a-half year Syrian civil war.  [and from another] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUd-ilVEAH0  Russian documentation on rebel chemicals cache. [and from another] June 2013 Turkey  http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/151261/russia-asks-turkey-for-info-on-sarin-terrorists.html
    Are Obama and Biden and Kerry playing a game, appearing to be as dumb as an ox about the “evidence” they have that Assad did it?  The US evidence merely shows satellite images of rockets being launched from Assad territory to the rebel held areas, but mortar does not prove the use of chemical weapons. Nor does concern about gas masks for their troops indicate guilt, as Assad’s intel could have told them another rebel chemical attack was likely. Meanwhile a valid AP associated interview where the rebels admit the August 21 incident was caused by materials provided to them and prior evidence garnered by Russia and Turkey is kept from the media. Why?

    The UN has determined rebel use of these weapons in the past, and is giving indications that this August 21 incident again was caused by the rebels.  The UN had just arrived to investigate prior chemical attacks when this attack happened, and it is illogical that Assad would do this now as he now has the upper hand in this civil war. The UN car was shot up as it entered the rebel area. The Assad held regions were no problem for the inspectors. All this screams that the rebels did not want inspection. Why is Obama stopping just short of rushing into another Middle East war when he has always been cautious about this and trying to extract the US from these conflicts?

    This seeming personality change on the part of Obama, a complete about face on keeping the US out of Middle East conflicts, and complete loss of insight and balance on who might be responsible and what steps to take (such as waiting for the UN inspection results) is puzzling. But it is an act, a chess game of the highest order. There are those who do not want the announcement to happen, the banking industry with close ties to Israel, but they have been stymied by Obama’s moves with Russia and China. They are trying to raise the argument that Obama will create a false flag incident, ie Nibiru, to deflect from his real troubles.

    The economy is not recovering. The US is broke, and owes China sums it cannot repay. Endless borrowing, endless debt, and budget wars once again on the horizon with the House Republicans. What better than a distraction like Nibiru, would be their argument. Israel and the bankers would argue that Russia and China are just being led astray by NASA, a pawn of the Obama’s administration. They hoped the Syrian incident would be yet another indication of a weak President whose word cannot be counted upon. By becoming a hawk, in a very safe environment, Obama has stymied their argument that he is a weak president trying to create a distraction with the announcement.

    The US will not go to war until Congress approves it, and it will not. Congress must also allocate more funds to the Pentagon for this new military action, which will result in endless arguments. Meanwhile the UN inspectors will present their case, gutting any argument for an attack on Assad. Any argument that Obama has invented Nibiru to get a weak President off the hotseat will have been countered, as Obama appears the strong one. We have described bait and switch techniques being used to catch the cover-up crowd in the US. This is an example of a feign and switch, a maneuver opposite of what is intended or expected while the REAL maneuver is taking place, unnoticed.
     
    <http://zetatalk.com/ning/07sp2013.htm>
     
    The wicked ENDTIME - NOT the RIGHTEOUS! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheEndTime2012
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.