- Form1 uses 120mW 405nm diode: Above is another view of the laser. According to the safety warning bundled with the printer, it is a 405nm, 120mW violet laserMessage 1 of 87 , Oct 3, 2013View SourceForm1 uses 120mW 405nm diode:
"Above is another view of the laser. According to the safety warning bundled
with the printer, it is a 405nm, 120mW violet laser diode." 
I burned down a __supposedly__ 700mW 405nm laser diode from bluray-burner (it's
really not vise for software guy to solder constant current driver, isn't it?)
The more powerful laser diodes are not easy to source- most of which are
available for reasonable prices (ie < $100) actually come from replacement sleds for
blu-ray writer drives.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:07:20PM +0100, Graham Stabler wrote:
> I'm not aware of any DIY galvanometer solutions for 3D printing. The
> Envisiontec machines are based on projectors aren't they?
> Unless you use a relatively powerful laser than galvanometers probably
> offer more problems than they solve. The Peachy printer for example is
> moving the spot at rates that could be easily achieved by moving the laser
> source itself and you have no issues with defocus etc. I'm not sure about
> the Form1, it might use a more powerful laser.
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:54 PM, <rm@...> wrote:
> > **
> > So, in case of galvanometers, what is the highest DIY XY resolution today
> > (that has been achieved!) ? In the commecial scene there is Envisiontec,
> > capable of doing 0,01 mm (10 um). I think there is more to win on quality
> > than there is on price
- FYI · F-theta lens, 405nm, STS-0580/173, (US)$ 4733 each Is that a lot ? Not if one is able to build large objects fast and accurate, I think. WhatMessage 87 of 87 , Nov 18, 2013View Source
· F-theta lens, 405nm, STS-0580/173, (US)$ 4733 each
Is that a lot ? Not if one is able to build large objects fast and accurate, I think.
What other expensive (new) elements a printer requires, when (re)using parts of the HP LaserJet ?
---In email@example.com, <rm@...> wrote:
Ah, was looking for that ! Tnx !
---In firstname.lastname@example.org, <grezmos@...> wrote:The lower video is fairly good:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:26 PM, <rm@...> wrote: