Re: [diatom_forum] Diatoms of the Arid Southwest
- View SourceCharles, actually I use it in a bathroom with a ceiling vent fan. Perhaps wrongly I have been assuming that peroxide breaks down to water and oxygen, oxidizing the organic material. It does have a peroxide smell while cooking. What would be the toxic part? -Rob
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:25 PM, charles suslavage <suslavage@...> wrote:Hi Rob,Don't do that in the house! H2O2 fumes are toxic!!Charles
From: Rob Kimmich <kimmich46@...>
Sent: Sun, April 29, 2012 2:38:38 PM
Subject: Re: [diatom_forum] Diatoms of the Arid Southwest
Maybe it's more than you need right now but H2O2 labeled 35% that I get at the health food store is producing satisfying results, at least for me. After the usual sieving I have been gently boiling samples for at least 3 hrs. Of course, there are multiple rounds of settling and swirling and diluting after. I am getting away with this in the house at the moment.
-RobOn Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Richard Carter <rcarter68502@...> wrote:David,Yes, I'll be quite happy to look at the slides from Texas, as long as you can put up with a fair bit of uncertainty in the ID's. I'll probably be using "cf." a lot, but I suppose that's better than no ID at all. Do use the plastic mailers (5-cell variety, not singles!) to send them -- I received a few more slides lately that were sandwiched in cardboard, all smashed. If you don't have these mailers, let me know and I'll send you a couple.
I also double posted a message during that interval, so I know exactly what you mean.I'm sorry to hear that you are considering "throwing in the towel" also. It is indeed a hard decision to make! Before I give up my slides and library I'll just be giving it a rest for a bit, to see how I feel a ways down the road. I will be finishing up the New Mexico samples for sure. I'm eager to get it done, as well as many Arizona samples that I've collected, but I simply can't do the cleaning with Rachel at home -- she gets really upset with boiling acid, even if it's in a far corner of the back yard. I'll just have to get her out of the house more -- send her shopping, ha ha! (The path that leads to bankruptcy, and residence in a cardboard box behind Walmart.....)
I have almost finished one sample from a lake in the White Mountains that I had high hopes for, as the sample contained a desmid indicative of softer, less alkaline water. I was hoping to get some Eunotia spp., but no such luck. Tons of diatoms, but mostly Epithemiaceae, lots of Cocconeis, and others of the "usual suspects". The sample still needs to be screened of fine crud before I make permanent slides. One of your samples will be finished after screening, also.Regards,Dick
From: David Richman <tithonia65@...>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 6:38 AM
Subject: [diatom_forum] Diatoms of the Arid SouthwestDick, et al.
As I have not heard from you or anybody else in regard to my
(unfortunately) double message (the forst one was not posted by Yahoo
for hours and then showed up AFTER I reposted) I'm not sure that
anybody got it.
To sum up - Andy Potter should have the slides ready soon. Are you
still willing to look at them? I have contacted the California
Academy of Sciences and they will take the left-over material.
Unfortunately the Lake Lucero sample had nothing in it, but I think
the rest may well be interesting. There should be at least ten or so
slides, mostly from West Texas.
As I said in my delayed message, I may have to make a hard decision
soon. With Mac gone and my options somewhat limited by circumstances I
may be throwing in the towel. I've enjoyed this very much and my
associations with various diatomists has been very fruitful. However
I am getting very little done lately in this and I would rather the
library and equipment be used than sit around.
- View SourceRob,A very stimulating post! I think your list of "questions" is excellent -- I'm sure each of us would offer different answers, but I also think that we each need to consider such questions.Thanks much,Dick
From: Rob Kimmich <kimmich46@...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 12:10 PM
Subject: [diatom_forum] Diatom Directions
Your note adds a lot to this great discussion of amateur study of diatoms. I have had your experience of using the SEM images to explain what I see with the LM. Dick has been one of my main sources for learning, too.
I see this discussion as what to do about distinguishing species, if that is possible for anyone, even with an SEM and a molecular lab. Even Dick, with the university library in Phoenix, is challenged, as he says. From my seat, the naming discussions have been cordial so far, e.g., Charles asking Dick to clarify a name as far as possible and Dick replying with a careful answer.
I certainly share the frustration I think I hear from Dick about pinning down an identification. I am finding that taking on any of this demands an acceptance of just not being able to know. Your point about not caring about naming accuracy may be the way to go here.
Hearing from you, Dick, and Dave helps me try to figure out what direction I want to take with all the images that I am accumulating and what it is I want to learn. Do I want to make species (or genus) lists of collections made? Am I happy with naming to genus? Do I want to learn more ecology? How important is sharing what I learn? (This forum has been a good place for that so far.) Do I want to continue developing LM technique?
By the way, would you be willing to ID some extant Mastogloia from the California desert?
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:08 AM, klaus.kemp <klaus.kemp@...> wrote:
Due to a catastrophic meltdown of my hard drive on my laptop I have been kept out of the loop for some time, only to find that where evryone behaved and everyone gained something from the group I now find there are ripples of dissent] and over what NAMES!
May I remind you all that when I first joined the group I quoted my dear friend Bernard Hartley who on our first meeting said " We must/ should never fall out over a name". Now I find that there is dissent over naming of Diatoms, those of you old enough and studied Diatoms before the advent of TEM, SEM will remember the advocates of doom and gloom saying these would be the death of amateurs. As it turned out it was far from the truth with the instruments often showing details which had been seen by amateurs and in fact the reverse was also true we often went back to our slides after seeing an SEM photo and lo and behold we now see what has been missed before.
This brings me to my main point, do not throw your dummies out of the pram over such an issue as names of Diatoms, I was very intimidated by the naming of Diatoms until I joined this group and Charles has been instrumental in my starting to enjoy this, true my main reason for avoiding that was lack of literature and with each of Charles's posting I learned a little more.
Charles if you are serious about throwing in the towel would you consider exchanging emails with me and continue your excellent teachings? I would be honoured and do not give a damn about if you are up to date within the last hour.
FOR THOSE WHO THINK WE ARE OUT OF DATE "WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE"?