Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [dsg] Re: response to hate mail etc - ... Credibility

Expand Messages
  • Dieter Möller
    Hi Ken, you wrote: Did someone rattle my chain? :-) D: not only ;-) , but all , who believe that the Buddha s teaching (satipatthana) was to know a
    Message 1 of 221 , Jul 1, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi Ken,

      you wrote:

      'Did someone rattle my chain? :-)'

      D: not only ;-) , but all , ' who believe that the Buddha's teaching (satipatthana) was to know a presently arisen paramattha dhamma.'

      Ken : When satipatthana is understood in this way there are no discrepancies whatsoever between the Canon and its commentaries.

      D: good advise , Ken .. so why don't we altogether see the Buddha Dhamma through that kind of spectacles ..? ;-)

      with Metta Dieter

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • jonoabb
      Hi Alex ... caves, ... heavy ... I haven t said any of that, so I m not going to bite here ;-)) ... I think if one looks closely at the texts, it was not going
      Message 221 of 221 , Jul 28, 2008
      • 0 Attachment
        Hi Alex

        > Where did the Buddha say: "Read Abhidhamma pitaka and live the lay
        > life that you always wanted? No need to strive in the forest,
        > empty houses and so on. Relax, doing is like for them, ignoramuses.
        > Here is TV remote, don't develop attabhava by engaging in like
        > work"

        I haven't said any of that, so I'm not going to bite here ;-))

        > Why did He often praise going forth as a monk, and not just that.
        > Being a reclusive monk aloof from other monks?

        I think if one looks closely at the texts, it was not going forth and
        living the life of a reclusive monk *per se* that was praised by the
        Buddha, but doing so perfectly and purely. Thus, it was praised only
        for those (very few now, but more in those days) who are sufficiently
        accomplished to achieve that.

        > > But "many cases" do not make it a requirement laid down by the
        > Buddha or even a general rule.
        > If you can achieve nanas and Jhanas at home, GOOD FOR YOU! I can't
        > argue with that.

        Again, not about me (or anyone in particular), but about the
        teachings as we have them today.

        It's a question of what the Buddha actually said (expressly or
        impliedly) in the suttas. It seems to me that you are attributing a
        particular aspect of doctrine to the Buddha on the basis of a number
        of suttas that describe a similar set of circumstances (but which do
        not contain any express or implied statement of the matter of

        > Sariputta needed 9 meditation levels + Buddha's occasional personal
        > guidance to become an Arahant. That is considering the fact that he
        > became a sotopanna when he heard a line of Dhamma.
        > MN111, MN74
        > MahaMoggallana needed 9 meditation levels + other things + almost
        > constant help from the Buddha himself.
        > http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn40/sn40.009.wlsh.html

        Sariputta and MahaMoggallana would not be the great disciples they
        were unless their attainment of enlightenment was based on high
        levels of jhana.

        > If you can beat them while cooking at home, I can't argue with that.

        An intriguing thought, but nothing to do with anything I've said in
        our discussion so far ;-)).

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.