Re: conventional still matters
- Dear Connie (Rob E., Alex, Han) -
> > Tep: ... it does not answer Alex's question the way I see it.T: You can say it three times, I will not mind at all.
> Connie: You might consider answering Alex yourself rather than challenging me to answer the way you see, Tep! What does it matter? If you don't like what Expositor says, I can only think (in my clumsy way) that it is not the fault of the water if the horse will only eat hay... something like that. Better I stick to quotes.
>C: Sorry, Tep! Didn't mean to tell you to answer Alex yourself twice.
I apologize for carelessly using unpleasant wordings. Sometimes my poking questions may offend others. So I will have to be mindful next time.
--- In email@example.com, "connie" <nichicon@...> wrote:
> Sorry, Tep! Didnât mean to tell you to answer Alex yourself twice.
> bully for me,
Hi Rob ERE: Hi Jon.
> RE: I will get into the next part about the Satipatthana sutta later, as I need to look at it to continue the discussion.
> J: Glad to hear you'll be checking out the text of the sutta for a change!! :-))
:-) I appreciate what I desperately hope is your humor here, and if so, is very funny.
I will get back to you with the usual sutta quotes as soon as I can. :-)
Very very funny, Jon. ; - /
- - - - - - - - - -
J: You may have forgotten in the confusion over the new format that you have already come back with a quote from the Satipatthana Sutta. My reply to your message can be found here: