Yeah, I have seen this type often, and wondered if they were fake or real. Wanted to ask you, but never got around to taking a pic. I have seen them for years around Copenhagen. Looks exactly like your pic.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@...> wrote:
>
> http://loohan.com/clouds4.3.10.jpg
>
> Normally, clouds either look like chem-clouds or real clouds to me. Sometimes they are mixed. Usually they are at different altitudes.
> But often i see clouds like this, that seem like hybrids. Clearly chemmy around the edges, but the centers look real.
> What is this phenomenon? When i see it it often covers most of the sky.
>

Usually the fake clouds are very, very dense and look heavy or that is how
they seems to me. Also they usually run in rows. Also the sun can not
shine through the fake ones because of all the chemcrap whereas natural
clouds it can. Usually they will spray at night, you will have a cloud over
starting of a day, then they will break apart but you will see the rows. These
are very FAKE.

Peace,

Gale ^i^
GaleWildAngel



________________________________
From: sittingtaoist <sittingtaoist@...>
To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 4:15:04 AM
Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question


Yeah, I have seen this type often, and wondered if they were fake or real. Wanted to ask you, but never got around to taking a pic. I have seen them for years around Copenhagen. Looks exactly like your pic.

--- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@. ..> wrote:
>
> http://loohan. com/clouds4. 3.10.jpg
>
> Normally, clouds either look like chem-clouds or real clouds to me. Sometimes they are mixed. Usually they are at different altitudes.
> But often i see clouds like this, that seem like hybrids. Clearly chemmy around the edges, but the centers look real.
> What is this phenomenon? When i see it it often covers most of the sky.
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, Gale Stark <galewildangels@...> wrote:
>
> Usually the fake clouds are very, very dense and look heavy or that is how
> they seems to me. Also they usually run in rows. Also the sun can not
> shine through the fake ones because of all the chemcrap whereas natural
> clouds it can. Usually they will spray at night, you will have a cloud over
> starting of a day, then they will break apart but you will see the rows. These
> are very FAKE.
>
> Peace,
>
> Gale ^i^
> GaleWildAngel
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: sittingtaoist <sittingtaoist@...>
> To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 4:15:04 AM
> Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question
>
>
> Yeah, I have seen this type often, and wondered if they were fake or real. Wanted to ask you, but never got around to taking a pic. I have seen them for years around Copenhagen. Looks exactly like your pic.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 3.10.jpg
> >
> > Normally, clouds either look like chem-clouds or real clouds to me. Sometimes they are mixed. Usually they are at different altitudes.
> > But often i see clouds like this, that seem like hybrids. Clearly chemmy around the edges, but the centers look real.
> > What is this phenomenon? When i see it it often covers most of the sky.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Here we go again today:
http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10.jpg

So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
A few minutes later i took this pic:
http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10a.jpg
in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@...> wrote:
>
> I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, Gale Stark <galewildangels@> wrote:
> >
> > Usually the fake clouds are very, very dense and look heavy or that is how
> > they seems to me. Also they usually run in rows. Also the sun can not
> > shine through the fake ones because of all the chemcrap whereas natural
> > clouds it can. Usually they will spray at night, you will have a cloud over
> > starting of a day, then they will break apart but you will see the rows. These
> > are very FAKE.
> >
> > Peace,
> >
> > Gale ^i^
> > GaleWildAngel
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: sittingtaoist <sittingtaoist@>
> > To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 4:15:04 AM
> > Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I have seen this type often, and wondered if they were fake or real. Wanted to ask you, but never got around to taking a pic. I have seen them for years around Copenhagen. Looks exactly like your pic.
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@ ..> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 3.10.jpg
> > >
> > > Normally, clouds either look like chem-clouds or real clouds to me. Sometimes they are mixed. Usually they are at different altitudes.
> > > But often i see clouds like this, that seem like hybrids. Clearly chemmy around the edges, but the centers look real.
> > > What is this phenomenon? When i see it it often covers most of the sky.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@...> wrote:
>
> Here we go again today:
> http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10.jpg
>
> So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> A few minutes later i took this pic:
> http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10a.jpg
> in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
>
>
> --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> >
> > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> >

Hi,

The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
commercial planes have to be being used.

Lovingly,

Gale ^i^
GaleWildAngel

White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
comes to this forum and only good flows from it.

Let go and Let God! God is reality!

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@...> wrote:
>
> The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> >
> > Here we go again today:
> > http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10.jpg
> >
> > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10a.jpg
> > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> >
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > >
>

Not necessarily. Even if it's ETs doing it, they might quit so as not to arouse interest.
Also somewhere i read claims that some areas supposedly did get sprayed during the post 9/11 hiatus.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "galewildangels" <galewildangels@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
> commercial planes have to be being used.
>
> Lovingly,
>
> Gale ^i^
> GaleWildAngel
>
> White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
> comes to this forum and only good flows from it.
>
> Let go and Let God! God is reality!
>
> --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@> wrote:
> >
> > The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here we go again today:
> > > http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10.jpg
> > >
> > > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > > http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10a.jpg
> > > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > > >
> >
>

Loohan,

Can you check out the new photo's in Awakenings Energy file and tell me what you
think.

Thanks!

Gale ^i^



________________________________
From: loohon <dogwood57@...>
To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 3:52:28 PM
Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question


Not necessarily. Even if it's ETs doing it, they might quit so as not to arouse interest.
Also somewhere i read claims that some areas supposedly did get sprayed during the post 9/11 hiatus.

--- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "galewildangels" <galewildangels@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
> commercial planes have to be being used.
>
> Lovingly,
>
> Gale ^i^
> GaleWildAngel
>
> White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
> comes to this forum and only good flows from it.
>
> Let go and Let God! God is reality!
>
> --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@ > wrote:
> >
> > The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here we go again today:
> > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10.jpg
> > >
> > > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10a.jpg
> > > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > > >
> >
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

All really top-notch stuff! I like that you are making CBs, too.
The orby things feel like good guys to me.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, Gale Stark <galewildangels@...> wrote:
>
> Loohan,
>
> Can you check out the new photo's in Awakenings Energy file and tell me what you
> think.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gale ^i^
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: loohon <dogwood57@...>
> To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, April 19, 2010 3:52:28 PM
> Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question
>
>
> Not necessarily. Even if it's ETs doing it, they might quit so as not to arouse interest.
> Also somewhere i read claims that some areas supposedly did get sprayed during the post 9/11 hiatus.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "galewildangels" <galewildangels@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
> > commercial planes have to be being used.
> >
> > Lovingly,
> >
> > Gale ^i^
> > GaleWildAngel
> >
> > White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
> > comes to this forum and only good flows from it.
> >
> > Let go and Let God! God is reality!
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
> > >
> > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here we go again today:
> > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10.jpg
> > > >
> > > > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > > > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10a.jpg
> > > > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

The sprayboys are at it again since yesterday, trying to catch up.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@...> wrote:
>
> Not necessarily. Even if it's ETs doing it, they might quit so as not to arouse interest.
> Also somewhere i read claims that some areas supposedly did get sprayed during the post 9/11 hiatus.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "galewildangels" <galewildangels@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
> > commercial planes have to be being used.
> >
> > Lovingly,
> >
> > Gale ^i^
> > GaleWildAngel
> >
> > White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
> > comes to this forum and only good flows from it.
> >
> > Let go and Let God! God is reality!
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
> > >
> > > --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here we go again today:
> > > > http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10.jpg
> > > >
> > > > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > > > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > > > http://loohan.com/clouds4.5.10a.jpg
> > > > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Skies here have been really, really nice clear and blue the last couple of days. Really
terrific weather here as well. Sun is out but there is a cool breeze after about a 45 minute
rain yesterday. I am sure it did my garden some good. There has been some crud being
blown in but that gone now as well.

Gale ^i^
GaleWildAngel





________________________________
From: sittingtaoist <sittingtaoist@...>
To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 5:23:09 AM
Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question


The sprayboys are at it again since yesterday, trying to catch up.

--- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@. ..> wrote:
>
> Not necessarily. Even if it's ETs doing it, they might quit so as not to arouse interest.
> Also somewhere i read claims that some areas supposedly did get sprayed during the post 9/11 hiatus.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "galewildangels" <galewildangels@ > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
> > commercial planes have to be being used.
> >
> > Lovingly,
> >
> > Gale ^i^
> > GaleWildAngel
> >
> > White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
> > comes to this forum and only good flows from it.
> >
> > Let go and Let God! God is reality!
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
> > >
> > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here we go again today:
> > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10.jpg
> > > >
> > > > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > > > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10a.jpg
> > > > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Nice. But they have been spraying somewhere upwind of me, judging by all the chem-clouds lately.

--- In destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com, Gale Stark <galewildangels@...> wrote:
>
> Skies here have been really, really nice clear and blue the last couple of days. Really
> terrific weather here as well. Sun is out but there is a cool breeze after about a 45 minute
> rain yesterday. I am sure it did my garden some good. There has been some crud being
> blown in but that gone now as well.
>
> Gale ^i^
> GaleWildAngel
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: sittingtaoist <sittingtaoist@...>
> To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 5:23:09 AM
> Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question
>
>
> The sprayboys are at it again since yesterday, trying to catch up.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > Not necessarily. Even if it's ETs doing it, they might quit so as not to arouse interest.
> > Also somewhere i read claims that some areas supposedly did get sprayed during the post 9/11 hiatus.
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "galewildangels" <galewildangels@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
> > > commercial planes have to be being used.
> > >
> > > Lovingly,
> > >
> > > Gale ^i^
> > > GaleWildAngel
> > >
> > > White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
> > > comes to this forum and only good flows from it.
> > >
> > > Let go and Let God! God is reality!
> > >
> > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
> > > >
> > > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here we go again today:
> > > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > > > > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10a.jpg
> > > > > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Yeah I get that from time to time here also, don't see the chemtrails just the
icky clouds that I know aren't real.

Just gotta keep after them, smiles

Lovingly,

Gale ^i^
GaleWildAngel



________________________________
From: loohon <dogwood57@...>
To: destroy_evil@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 4:18:08 PM
Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question


Nice. But they have been spraying somewhere upwind of me, judging by all the chem-clouds lately.

--- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, Gale Stark <galewildangels@ ...> wrote:
>
> Skies here have been really, really nice clear and blue the last couple of days. Really
> terrific weather here as well. Sun is out but there is a cool breeze after about a 45 minute
> rain yesterday. I am sure it did my garden some good. There has been some crud being
> blown in but that gone now as well.
>
> Gale ^i^
> GaleWildAngel
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: sittingtaoist <sittingtaoist@ ...>
> To: destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 5:23:09 AM
> Subject: [destroy_evil] Re: cloud question
>
>
> The sprayboys are at it again since yesterday, trying to catch up.
>
> --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@ ..> wrote:
> >
> > Not necessarily. Even if it's ETs doing it, they might quit so as not to arouse interest.
> > Also somewhere i read claims that some areas supposedly did get sprayed during the post 9/11 hiatus.
> >
> > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "galewildangels" <galewildangels@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The same thing happened here during and after 911. So that should prove that
> > > commercial planes have to be being used.
> > >
> > > Lovingly,
> > >
> > > Gale ^i^
> > > GaleWildAngel
> > >
> > > White light of Jesus Christ to surround this forum with love and protection. Only good
> > > comes to this forum and only good flows from it.
> > >
> > > Let go and Let God! God is reality!
> > >
> > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "sittingtaoist" <sittingtaoist@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The sky over Copenhagen is absolutely splendid today. After all planes have been grounded for 4 days, there isn't even a wisp of stale chem at the horizon.
> > > >
> > > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here we go again today:
> > > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > So, what % of this is real? Why does the chem seem to stick to real clouds?
> > > > > A few minutes later i took this pic:
> > > > > http://loohan. com/clouds4. 5.10a.jpg
> > > > > in the same part of the sky. Here it seems clear that the top item is chem, and a real cloud is beneath it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In destroy_evil@ yahoogroups. com, "loohon" <dogwood57@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I see the fake ones as usually being more like cotton candy; thinner, wispy. Like around the edges of the clouds in this pic, but usually not quite as wispy as that. They generally seem more translucent than real clouds.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]