Re: SRD and ebook rips
--- In delany-list@y..., Eric <digmez@e...> wrote:
just a couple of things, then I'll go away
> You are right that I am being harsh in my response to "caeterk," but
> he/she/etc has yanked hard on my shmengle (attached by the short
hairs to my
> sensibility) with this guise of an innocent, that he/she/etc clearly
"guise of an innocent" that's funny. uhhh *holds himself back
with great restraint* In another forum I would flame you, but
that is not my purpose here.
Did I say anything about not understanding copyright law?
Unless you're a lawyer I'm probably more familiar with US
code on the subject than you are. Have I in any way, shape or
form denigrated SRD? If I didn't respect him, I would never
have made the original post in the first place.
> Anyone who goes on a public list asking for a response from the
> has made it clear that they will accept nothing less than a
> verifiable document from that author himself, has made it clear that
dude, do you want me to post a message here that looks like
it came from you, just as an explanation of why I said that? It's
really not hard to do.
> not trust us, and (judging both from what has been said and the lack
> response to the most traffic this list has seen in a dog's age)
> care what we have to say.
well, sorry I didn't respond soon enough for you, but
that's life. If I hadn't wanted some response -- eg, some
place he does read -- I would have never posted here in the
Glad I could liven up the place
> All of this comes couched in a profession of love; I say he is a
scoundrel maybe; never petty
[large snip of repetative arguments]
> > >
> > > 5) I have spoken to Mr. Delany concerning this
> > > matter, today in reference to
> > > your 'question' and he has made it clear to me that
> > > he would prefer if you
your grammer is bad. and I spoke to God today
(um, or was that Stalin)
> > > do not steal his works, though he suggests that
> > > there are a number of
> > > uncollected essays that he would not object to
> > > posting.
> > >
> > > I have given him your email address (though you
> > > courageously neglect to
> > > include your name) but do not expect to hear from
anyone who posts real personal information on net the without
security verifications is just waiting to get ripped. LEARN.
> > > him as he would prefer not
> > > to be involved in an on-line debate. So, if you are
obviously you didn't read the original msg. I asked for
a one word response about it -- except for you people,
it's not worthy of debate.
> > > waiting for a "pgp
> > > verification" before you respect your favorite
why does pgp scare you all so much?
> > > author's legal and moral
> > > rights, I suggest that you would be better off
> > > confronting him at one of his
> > > public appearances (like tonight at Barnes & Noble,
> > > Union Square N. @
> > > 7:30pm) and just spitting in his face.
only a coward would even suggest spitting in his face,
you pigfucking armadillodicksucking Vogon whore
(oops -- he started to get out)
> > >
> > > -Eric Solstein
- --- Zvi Gilbert <zvi@...> wrote:
> A gentle reminder from your list moderator:I do apologize for my language the other
> This is a forum for discussion of SRD, his works,
> and related topics.
> No flames, please (I'll put it in the list charter,
> if you feel there's a
> need), and try to keep a lid on the insulting
> language (caeterk@...
> & everyone else). Personal invective doesn't belong
> on this list.
> Thank you,
day. That was not necessary.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/