Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [decentralization] SHA-1 Identifiers

Expand Messages
  • Ben Houston
    ... Probably going to SHA-1 isn t too big of a problem. I ll bring it up with those that I know. Interestingly, there are ways to add file hashes within the
    Message 1 of 55 , Feb 20 1:37 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      Justin Chapweske said:
      > ... switch to SHA-1.
      >
      > The biggest group that I havn't yet talked to about this is the Gnutella
      > guys, but I'm sure they'd be into it as well. Any Gnutellians on the
      > list?

      Probably going to SHA-1 isn't too big of a problem. I'll bring it up with
      those that I know. Interestingly, there are ways to add file hashes within
      the existing protocol specifications - it should even be backwards
      compatible.

      Cheers,
      -ben houston
      http://www.exocortex.org/~ben
    • Ben Houston
      ... Probably going to SHA-1 isn t too big of a problem. I ll bring it up with those that I know. Interestingly, there are ways to add file hashes within the
      Message 55 of 55 , Feb 20 1:37 AM
      • 0 Attachment
        Justin Chapweske said:
        > ... switch to SHA-1.
        >
        > The biggest group that I havn't yet talked to about this is the Gnutella
        > guys, but I'm sure they'd be into it as well. Any Gnutellians on the
        > list?

        Probably going to SHA-1 isn't too big of a problem. I'll bring it up with
        those that I know. Interestingly, there are ways to add file hashes within
        the existing protocol specifications - it should even be backwards
        compatible.

        Cheers,
        -ben houston
        http://www.exocortex.org/~ben
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.