6778Re: Mobility Architecture -- feedback
- Sep 2 6:31 PMOne thing that is not covered is P2P with mobile devices, you seem more
focused on client/server.
It would be nice to have a device that can oppourtunisticaly network with
other devices providing a communication system that while slow should
provide a close to zero cost for message delivery.
Such a system would only be useful where the messages are not critical yet
where persistant contact paths exist its convienience and non-reliance on
infrastructure would be beneficial.
Protocol would be of the form 'if you see person x let them know y', hashes
of short messages and their destination could be broadcast with recievers
checking the destination against previous contact paths. If free space
allows the reciever could request the message on a best try basis. As
storage and unit use densities increase this method will work better.
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:30:20 -0700This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
> From: Johannes Ernst <jernst@...>
> Subject: Re: Mobility Architecture -- feedback?
> based on the server logs, I think quite a few of you seem to have
> looked at this paper since we posted it.
> But the feedback has been, shall we say, sparse. This is one of the
> highest-IQ mailing lists that I am aware of anywhere, with lots of
> people who have related experience (and opinions!). After
> all, mobile
> user behavior is about as decentralized as it gets -- and how to
> support such decentralized behavior is one of the core challenges of
> mobile software technology in my view.
> What can we do to challenge you so you will send e-mail and disagree
> with us on this paper? ;-)
> We are sincerely interested in your positive and negative
> feedback. Can
> we get some more?
> The URL again:
- Next post in topic >>