2720Re: WG, per Sergei Osokin
- Jun 1, 2001--- In decentralization@y..., coderman <coderman@m...> wrote:
> It would also be very reasonable to limit scholarship basedActually when I was talking to P2PWG people there, I argued
> memberships to working group resources which do not have a
> significant price associated with them (like free conference
> attendance, etc).
that there's no concievable purpose in limiting the access to
such resources at all. Since the WG is obviously interested in
receiving the widest possible range of feedback, things like
mailing lists and discussions should be available for everyone
who has something to say, whether he's a member or not.
The individual reaction to that suggestion was generally
positive - the whole WG viewpoint might be different, of
Best wishes -
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>