Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

MIRROR: This war is NOT working

Expand Messages
  • D. Dostanic
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12795678&method=full&siteid=50143 THE MIRROR, Tuesday, April 1, 2003 This war is NOT working By Peter
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 1, 2003
    • 0 Attachment

      THE MIRROR, Tuesday, April 1, 2003

      This war is NOT working

      By Peter Arnett

      I am still in shock and awe at being fired. There is enormous sensitivity
      within the US government to reports coming out from Baghdad.

      They don't want credible news organisations reporting from here because it
      presents them with enormous problems.

      I reported on the original bombing for NBC and we were half a mile away from
      those massive explosions. Now I am really shocked that I am no longer
      reporting this story for the US and awed by the fact that it actually

      That overnight my successful NBC reporting career was turned to ashes. And

      Because I stated the obvious to Iraqi television; that the US war timetable
      has fallen by the wayside.

      I have made those comments to television stations around the world and now
      I'm making them again in the Daily Mirror.

      I'm not angry. I'm not crying. But I'm also awed by this media phenomenon.

      The right-wing media and politicians are looking for any opportunity to be
      critical of the reporters who are here, whatever their nationality. I made
      the misjudgment which gave them the opportunity to do so.

      I gave an impromptu interview to Iraqi television feeling that after four
      months of interviewing hundreds of them it was only professional courtesy to
      give them a few comments.

      That was my Waterloo - bang!

      I have not yet decided what to do, whether to pack my bags and leave Baghdad
      or stay on.

      I'll decide what to do today, right now I'm chewing on what has happened to

      But whatever happens I will never stop reporting on the truth of this war
      whether I am in Baghdad or somewhere else in the Middle East - or even back
      in Washington.

      I was here in 1991 and the bombing is very similar to that conflict but the
      reality is very different.

      The US and British want to come here, take over the city, upturn the
      government and take us through to a new era. The troops are in the country
      and fighting there way up here. It creates a very different atmosphere.

      The Ba'ath party, currently led by Saddam Hussein, has been in power for 34
      years. Tariq Aziz told me the US will have to brainwash 25 million Iraqis
      because these people think exactly the same as Saddam does.

      Maybe he is wrong, maybe not.

      For months, Iraqis have said officially and privately: "We will fight the
      Americans, we will use guerrilla tactics, we will surprise them."

      But the Iraqi opposition has said: "This will be a pushover, everyone wants
      to rebel against Saddam."

      Now the reality is being played out on the battlefield.

      We have to watch the reality now and some Iraqis are fighting and the
      government does seem very determined. For me to see that and to be
      criticised for saying the obvious is unfair.

      But it has made me a target for my critics in the States who accuse me of
      giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

      I don't want to give aid and comfort to the enemy - I just want to be able
      to tell the truth.

      I came to Baghdad with my crew because the Iraqi side needs to be heard too.

      It is clear the original timetable that America would be in Baghdad by the
      end of March has fallen by the wayside.

      There is clearly debate in the US about this, reinforcements are being sent
      in and there are delays.

      This doesn't mean it is going badly. Every casualty is a loss but they have
      been in limited numbers so far.

      Every night and every day I hear the B-52s and the missiles hammering the
      defences Baghdad.

      Just like in Afghanistan and Vietnam, the US is bringing enormous firepower
      to bear which it believes will grind the Iraqis down. I have seen it before
      and it has been enormously effective. The US optimism is justified.

      On the other hand, at what cost to civilians?

      During the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, I entered a US-held town which had been
      totally destroyed.

      The Viet Cong had taken over and were threatening the commander's building
      so he called down an artillery strike which killed many of his own men.

      The Major with us asked: "How could this happen?" A soldier replied: "Sir,
      we had to destroy the town to save it."

      The Bush and Blair administration does not want that label stuck on this
      war, it is a liberation for them. But the problem is US Marines at
      checkpoints are suspicious of every man, woman and child because of the
      suicide bomb.

      Already there is suspicion growing.

      And in the south, there have not been popular rebellions and uprisings. As
      the battle for Baghdad grows, the potential for civilian casualties grows.

      This is the spectre rising as this war continues. The US and Britain have to
      figure this out.

      I don't think you can tell how it will end, there are many scenarios. A
      siege of Baghdad... a special operations strike on Saddam. Optimists in the
      Pentagon talk about an internal coup.

      Who would have had believed Umm Qasr would hold out for six days or US
      Marines directing traffic would be killed by a suicide bomber? This is more
      like the West Bank and Gaza and it could become like that in some areas.

      The US and Britain must avoid that scenario.

      Forces come in, communities resist, then suicide bombing and resistance from

      Except the Iraqis will be putting up a stiffer fight than the Palestinians
      because they are better armed.

      We know the world, including many Americans, is ambivalent about this war
      and I think it is essential to be here.

      I'm not here to be a superstar. I have been there in 1991 and could never be
      bigger than that.

      Some reporters make judgements but that is not my style. I present both
      sides and report what I see with my own eyes.

      I don't blame NBC for their decision because they came under great
      commercial pressure from the outside.

      And I certainly don't believe the White House was responsible for my

      But I want to tell the story as best as I can, which makes it so
      disappointing to be fired.

      Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.