Dan is SORE LOSER!
- --dantreble wrote:
> --"Mark" wrote:-M: Dan DODGED! #1
> > >-M: 'certainty' or *entrenched certainty*?
> > D: You heard me the first time, Polly.
>-M: You seem a bit *certain* about that.
> > > >D: Voltaire's "Certainty is insanity" seems right. Dancertainty is insanity.
> > >-M: The obvious first danger here is to be certain that
> > -M: Doink! I had to reinsert that one because you DODGED it. #2confusion is not contagious, but you get bird droppings everywhere.
> > D: The obvious first danger is letting you out of the Home. Your
>-M: LOL! The confusion is yours for your *certain* position against*certainty* - doink!
-M: DODGED! #3
> > > >M: And you said '"faith-based" belief becomes *faith-based*certainty...'What is the difference? They both yield action, correct?
Maybe the only difference in in the long term. So it seems now that
the only issue is one of *entrenchment*.
> > > D: Entrenchment is a separate issue; it's a matter of greaterdegree of insanity. The "sane" person keeps "faith" and Reality
> > -M: But does anyone have Reality? You seem to think not, so nowall that we have are our faith-based takes on this reality. All we
act upon is our faith, and to deny this is to have *faith* to the
> > D: We do have probability. What's the problem?probability, is *certain*. This is how we can be certain about
>-M: The action, which evidences the decision thresholds of this
So everyone acts as with certainty.
-M: DODGED! #4
> > >D: Inductive inference...I guess that someone could infer without inductively derived data,
> > -M: Redundant?
> >D: No.
>-M: Being *certain* again?
but wouldn't that tend to be fantasy?
-M: Dan DODGED again! #5
> > >D:...leads only to probability in conclusions. Reality (capitalR) remains hidden to us. Profoundly so, when one considers our
limitations in apprehending.
> > -M: So now its *epistemological overconfidence*? This sounds likean entrenchment to me as I said earlier.
> >D: Everything sounds like an entrenchent to you.Are you DODGING again, like a WUSSY? #6
>-M: Well is the point an entrenchment?
-M: Dan DODGED the question about him DODGING! - LOL! #7
> >D: Nothing new there. You are entrenched in your view ofentrenchment.
>-M: I am entrenched in the truth? If so, how is this bad?-M: Dodged again! #8
> >M: And to call this 'faith-based' seems to ignore the fact thatcountering opinions are also faith-based. Not good for functional
differentiation for the purposes of categorization.
> >D: That is how it seems to you, but you are the only thing beingignored. Get used to it.
> > -M: Are you feeling stupid? #9-M: LOL!
> D: No. I'm feeling intelligent.
>D: As someone who has "whupped" you ever since your arrival,...-M: LOL! (I have asked Dan where he has successfully attacked the
content of any of my posts, and he keeps DODGING!)
>D: I'm enjoying your display of foolishness.-M: LOL!
>D: I'm sorry that you don't have the capacity to enjoy it too. Dan-M: You enjoy the benevolent pain that you are addicted to.
>M: Wouldn't you feel better if you were a sport?-M: Dodge #10 - LOL!
So Dan prefers being a stupid dodge-monkey than being a sport.
Mark, Seattle WA USA
- richard godwin wrote:
> You are sick, sick, sick. Poor man.And here's the part where they slap you with pity and put you down for
not being religious like they are.
- Mark <parashakti108@...> wrote: --dantreble wrote:
> --lord damien wrote:intense religous belief results in physical changes to the brain
> >ld: interestingly enough there is research being done to see if
-M: I would imagine that it would. Imagine would your brain would be
like right now without science, logic, English and mathematics. I
would guess that your intense religous belief(built on these
foundations) has strengthened your neural pathways.
LD2 - i think the inference is a detrimental physical change not a positive one.
> >ld:...it is well established that thought patterns andenvironmental factors can result in such changes. the question of
whether religion is a disease is far from a fanciful one.
-M: Only if such a religion is based on superstition...
LD2 - name one that isn't (using my definition of religion not yours though)
> D: Agreed.-M: ...or in your case, dodge-monkeyism.
Mark, Seattle WA USA
True religion Religion Religion book Bad religion Christian religion Beliefs
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "deathtoreligion" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, n1n31nchn3rd <n1n31nchn3rd@...>
>for not being religious like they are.
> richard godwin wrote:
> > You are sick, sick, sick. Poor man.
> > Richard.
> And here's the part where they slap you with pity and put you down
>Then they drag you to a pond and try to drown you, and steal