8974Re: [Death To Religion] 430 / zealot
- Oct 1, 2005--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Mark" <parashakti108@y...> wrote:
> -M: In science, aren't you asked to believe in the ScientificYou don't have to believe in it. The evidence that it works is right
in front of you (you are using a computer to read this right?).
> -M: The way I see it, my definition is much older and well testedYour definition is well tested yes.
> than your definition. If semantic games are being played, it by your
> team. This is why I am for debating over definitions.
Well tested and found to be wanting.
> -M: Science reports aren't testimony?Correct.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>