11403Re: [Death To Religion] Re: A Strategy of 'Subversive Rationalization' for a post-Ab
- Apr 8, 2008The human brain would have to get much bigger, like such a big head as to
preempt natural childbirth, until the woman adapts (a problem mentioned by
some evolutionists): big enough to have the capability of limiting the
control of emotions (need, desire, fear, wishful thinking) over cognition.
Socialism is not a religion. Reminds me of the prominent theologian
defining religion to be broad enough, but so broad as to elicit the response
of a reporter: "and that would include the IRS?"
We wouldn't have been saddled with Bush is the Dems had a reasonably viable
candidate. Gore?--uks. Kerry?--worse uks.
Racist is one of those very ambiguous words. I think Obama and his wife
have just alligned themselves with the black perspective that they still are
considered inferior to whitey and still are under a kind of bondage, albeit
it not slavery. Maybe he could have Sharpton or Jesse for VP. Farakon
(sp?) wouldn't fly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim " <timothydj@...>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:08 PM
Subject: [Death To Religion] Re: A Strategy of 'Subversive Rationalization'
for a post-Ab
> Obama probably will be the offering for the Dems. He is for sure a
> racist that has very little to offer except the ability to spend
> money like he's mad at it and line of marxist rethoric that,
> typically, makes no sense at all. He offers less hope than the
> Lottery. He might make a good, smooth talkin' Secetary of State if he
> didn't have such a disdain for everything American.
> He would accomplish as much as the do-nothing Dems in the do-nothing
> Congress. Sadly, this is a time when we could use a little leadership
> but there's little chanch of that.
> I'm mixed about religion in politics. It's a great tool for keeping
> the sheep in line but sometimes the sheep want me to jump over the
> cliff with them. Religion might be with us forever- humans might need
> it to replace whatever we lost in the way of instincts when our
> brains got big.
> Isn't socialism just another religion?
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, bestonnet_00 <no_reply@...>
>> --- In email@example.com, "Richard Godwin" <meta@>
>> > ==(they do look set to kick the Republicans out of power at their
>> > next election and have a populous that is fed up with the
>> > theocrats).
>> > I suspect you would be proven wrong. Undoubtedly Obama will be
>> > Democrat candidate.
>> Him or another Clinton (and probably the loser between those two
>> the vice president).
>> > Judging by his spiritual advisor, I suspect he, leader of the
>> > Democratics, will then be the theocrats,
>> I suspect not. He is religious to be sure but he does seem to
>> that religion should be kept out of government and that laws should
>> not be made unless they serve a secular purpose.
>> > while McCain does not favor religion, although he does use all
>> > sources for election support, such as the Evangelicals who are a
>> > very large voting group.
>> Hard to say, he's attempt at becoming presidential candidate in 2000
>> was destroyed because he didn't pander to the nut cases but he sure
>> seems to be doing a lot of pandering to them now. Should he get in
>> it'll probably be just like another term of Bush.
>> There is also Congress which should become majority democrat.
>> > The special privilege I have for a long time hoped to be corrected
>> > is the tax exempt status for the all sorts of religious
>> > organization. Churches should pay taxes just like the rest of
>> > After all it is a well-established fact they are businesses in the
>> > common definition of money makers.
>> That's the big one that we need to see corrected (though I wouldn't
>> have a problem with religious organisations which provide charity
>> isn't intended to convert people nor restricted to only their
>> getting tax exemptions) although there are others that I'd like to
>> away with (about the only one I'd keep would be exemptions from
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>