Re: [dansguardian] I-CAP for the future?
- View SourceOrlow, Jeremy wrote:
> Could someone give me a 2 sentence answer to this: what is i-cap? I tried looking at the official sites, but couldn't sift through the loads of...marketing that were thrown at me.hm, icap server/client support for dg/dgav would be neat.
it would allow dg (as an icap server) to easily integrate into
existing content inspection architectures (through an open protocol)
and/or on the other side allow dgav (as an icap client) to utilize
existing icap servers for av-scanning ..
see for example the samba-vscan project on openantivirus.org,
which brings icap-client functionality into samba (allowing it
to av-scan files on access with the help of an icap-server)
however, rewriting dg to provide icap-server functionality is
probably not that easy ... but a starting point could be
a simple icap-client viruscanning class (for dgav) ...
(iirc there was even some talk about icap support for
clamav on one of their lists)
> From what I saw, it looks like a glorified plug-in architecture that would consume cpu power and require DG to written in a very different way.http://www.i-cap.org/spec/rfc3507.txt section 4.1
gives a pretty decent introduction to icap.
> That's my $0.02.my EUR0.02 :-)
- View SourceOn 08/03/2004-09:18PM, Peter Arnold wrote:
>I do think that ICAP is absolutely the right direction but I think it is
> Hi, just a thought but has ICAP been considered as a future
> option/direction for dansguardian? It strikes me a a good fit to
> the concept of dansguardian doing what DG and/or DGAV does best and
> leaving all the ACLs and authentication to squid.
very dependant on the quality of the ICAP support in Squid. I get the
impression that it is lacking at the moment.