Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Debate

Expand Messages
  • Miriam Taylor
    Miriam (Mimi) Taylor ... Dear all, Thank you Gabriele, although, please do take a vote of all the participants And only the
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 3, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Miriam (Mimi) Taylor <mirtaylo@...>

      > Dear Mimi, dear all,
      > It is not a question of discrimination. Not at all. I understood Mimi's
      > arguments very well, and I agree with almost every point she mentions. I
      > would like to mention
      > a point which seems very important to. I mean the specific, spiritual
      > Jewish common sphere created and conditioned by the common history of
      > our people.
      > This is a dimension which can by no means be experienced by Gentiles.
      > The common wavelength which exists between us cannot be extended to
      > other nations and religions. This is what has kept us together for 2000
      > years of Galut.
      > Since the Reunion is, as I understand, meant to be a forum of expressing
      > and for sharing our experiences, feelings, unanswered questions,
      > nostalgic memories traumatisms, unfinished grievance processes, deep
      > emotions, visions, being all part of our private and intimate life, I,
      > for myself, find that the Reunion should be kept as a "closed" event. Do
      > we have to show off?
      > However, if the committee (and that's why we have a committee,) decides
      > otherwise, I shall accept their decision and behave accordingly.If Ms.
      > Rostos is accepted (she seems a very nice, interested and interesting
      > young person, speaks excellent English) , then all the others who _might
      > _want to come as observers,_
      > s_hould be welcomed. Although, Mimi and Reunion, if there are observers,
      > won't we be inhibited?
      > As to what Charles writes - usually one talks about two Jews and three
      > opinions. Thank goodness, the Jewish nation has so much brain-power that
      > there is no limit to the amount of opinions and ideas, I am sure the two
      > could come up with another 100 opinions! But among civilized people one
      > should reach an agreement.
      > I doubt whether there will by any more reporters or journalists or
      > film-directors asking about coming. However, it does not seem right to
      > censure what they would be doing. No censorship please. You can't shut
      > people's mouth.
      > And as to Hollywood, Charles - with Glanz, Glory and Glamour -they
      > have been making their big business this way, otherwise they would be
      > dead today.
      > I strongly disagree about the comments regarding the films of Volker
      > Koepp - who has seen "Herr Zwilling und Frau Zuckermann" will agree that
      > it is an excellent movie, it has had great success in Germany and is
      > being shown regularly on TV. It has become a "cult" film here. The
      > second one is maybe not so good because there are a lot of characters in
      > the film, and not all so directly connected to Czernowitz. However, they
      > are not sad films by any means., perhaps a bit melancholy, - Koepp
      > looks beyond the faces of the persons speaking, and his language is at
      > the same time poetical and realistic.
      > Last year my husband travelled with Koepp to Czernowitz, and for the
      > first time, the two films were
      > shown at the "Cinemagoga", the converted synagogue. The hall was packed,
      > a very mixed audience, and there was simultaneous translation. There was
      > a discussion afterwards, and the reactions from the audience were mixed.
      > There were several persons who were upset that Koepp had not shown "more
      > about
      > modern Czernowitz and what good things have happened since the war.
      > Koepp's reply was that he didn't know what to show, the glorious
      > buildings of the communist era, the great situation of the working
      > people, who don't know when their salaries come, or don't have enough
      > money, or , or Other persons complained that the films were only about
      > Jews-yet in the first film we see the Ukrainian farmers and their
      > festivities, in the second film there are at least 2 non-Jewish local
      > characters, the old German Mr. Schlamp and the young Ukrainian student
      > Tanja, who have a lot to tell. That's how people react. They see what
      > they want to see.
      > I will bring the two videos of the film to the Reunion, and perhaps in
      > the evenings there will be time to see them, for those who are interested.
      > All this does not mean that I want Koepp to come. He is just interested
      > in any event taking place in Czernowitz. And for the other
      > journalist/cameraman, I don't even know him, he was recommended to me by
      > the former director of the Bosch Foundation in Czernowitz.
      > All this will make things easier or more difficult?
      > My best regards to all of you, and to the Committee, who has been
      > working so hard.
      > Gabriele
      Dear all,

      Thank you Gabriele, although, please do take a vote of all the participants
      And only the participants, as on the last table of participants. The
      committee was elected a long time ago, before half of the current
      participants even know of the committee, also before we considered such

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.