Res: [tied] Re: Ossetic fox
- --- In email@example.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>A rather long quote, from Burrow 'The Sanskrit language' again:
> On 2007-02-03 13:18, Joao S. Lopes wrote:
> > Raposa seems to be superficially similar to lopas^a. Is there any
> > Iranian equivalent of Indian lopas^a ? Something like *laupasa or
> > *raupasa? The Alans was settled in Iberia.
> > Perhaps *raupasa>*rapausa>raposa ???
> Middle Persian ro:pa:s, Mod.Per. rubah point to PIr. *raupa:c'-.
§12. Treatment of r and l
In Iranian IE r and l appear indiscriminately as r (there are a few
exceptions in Modern Persian and occasionally elsewhere : Pers.
lis^tan 'to lick', Skt. rih-, lik, Gk. leikho:; las^in 'soft', Skt.
s´lak.s.ná- : lab 'lip' : Lat. labium ; Oss. sald 'cold' : Lith.
s^áltas). In the language of the R.gveda this is predominantly the
case. In Classical Sanskrit both l and r are found, but their
distribution does not correspond exactly with that of Indo-European.
In certain Eastern dialects of Indo-Aryan (notably in the inscriptions
of As´oka and in the Ma:gadhi: of the Drama) only l is found. The
treatment of IE l in Sanskrit is illustrated by the following examples :
(a) l becomes r : rin.ákti 'leaves' : Lat. linquit; s´rón.i-
'buttock' : Lat. clu:nis, Lith. s^launìs ; sarpís 'butter', Toch. A.
s.älyp, cf. Engl. salve ; aratní- 'elbow' : Gk. ò:léne:, Lat. ulna ;
s´rávas 'fame' : Gk. kléos, O. Sl. slovo 'word' ; gárbha- 'embryo' :
Gk. delphús 'id', `adelphós 'brother' (cf. sodara-) ; cakrá- 'wheel'
: Gk. kúklos ; paras´ú- 'axe' : Gk. pélekus ; píparti 'fills' : Gk.
píple:mi; pur- 'city' : Lith. pilìs, Gk. pólos; s´ri- 'to lean' :
Gk. klíno:; sú:rya- 'sun', Lat. so:l.
(b) l remains : lúbhyati 'covets' : Lat. lubet; palitá-
'grey-haired' : cf. Gk. poliós, pelitnós, etc. ; °kulva- 'bald' : Lat.
calvus; palá:va- 'chaff' : O. Sl. pléva, Lat. palea; palvala- 'pond'
: cf. Lat. palus 'swamp' ; pli:hán- 'spleen' : Gk. sple:n, Lat. lien ;
dala- 'portion' : Lith. dalìs ; klóman- 'lung' : Gk. pleúmo:n.
In comparing the Vedic with the Classical language we notice :
(i)that in a number of words the latter has l where the former has r,
and this normally in cases where l appears in other IE languages, e.g.
laghú- 'light' v. raghu-, Gk. `elakhús, Lat. levis; plu- 'to float',
v. pru-, Gk. pléo: ; lip- ' to smear', v. rip-, Gk. aleipho: ; lih-
'to lick ', v. rih-, Gk. leíkho: ;
(ii) that a considerable proportion of the classical words which
preserve IE are not found in the text of the R.gveda, either by
accident, or because their meaning was of such a nature that they were
not likely to appear in a text of sacred hymns (e.g. plús.i- 'flea'
: Arm. lu, Alb. pl'es^t, cf. Lith. blusà) ;
(iii) that some derivatives which have become isolated from their
roots preserve IE l even when it is normally replaced by r in the
corresponding roots : s´lóka- 'verse' (s´ru-), vipula- 'great,
extensive' (pr´.-, píparti 'fill').
The explanation of this apparently complicated treatment is fairly
simple. The dialect at the basis of the R.gvedic language lay to the
north-west, while the classical language was formed in Madhyades´a.
The original division must have been such that the Western dialect
turned l into r in the same way as Iranian (being contiguous to
Iranian, and at the same time probably representing a later wave of
invasion), while the more easterly dialect retained the original
distinction. It was in this latter area that Classical Sanskrit was
elaborated, but it was not evolved as a separate literary language,
distinct from that of the Veda; on the contrary it developed as a
modification of the old sacred language of the Vedic hymns. The latter
was always the foundation of the literary language, but since after
the earliest period (and this excludes most of the later tenth book of
the R.gveda), the centre of its cultivation shifted eastward to
Madhyades´a, in its further development it was subject to the
continuous influence of the dialectal forms of this region. So in the
case of the distribution of r and l many of the basic words of the
vocabulary retain always the form established by the Vedic literature,
but in other cases l-forms based on the dialect of Madhyades´a replace
them. In cases where the word in question is not found in the Vedic
text, and where therefore there existed no established literary
tradition, the Eastern form with original l almost universally appears.
The treatment of IE r is different in that in the vast majority of
cases it continues to be represented by r in all periods of the
language, e.g. rudhirá- ' red, blood', Gk. `eruthrós; járant- 'old',
Gk. géro:n 'old man' ; raí- 'property', Lat. re:s, pári 'round', Gk.
perí; vártate 'turns', Lat. vertitur, párdate 'breaks wind', Gk.
pérdetai, ; pá:rs.n.i- 'heel', Gk. ptérna, Goth. fairzna ; sru- ' to
flow', Gk. réo: ; náras n. pl. 'men', Gk. `anéres, `ándres ; sárpati
'crawls', Gk. ´erpo:, Lat. serpo: ; rá:j-, rá:jan- 'king', Lat. re:x ;
rátha- 'chariot', Lith. ra:tas 'wheel', Lat. rota 'id' ; vi:rá-
'man, hero', Lith. výras, Lat. vir, etc.
On the other hand instances of l in place of IE r are comparatively
rare: lóhita- 'red' (also róhita-, Av. raoiDita-, cf. rudhirá-) ; álam
'suitable, enough', v. áram, cf. Gk. `ararísko: ; pala:yate 'flees'
(para: with i- 'to go'). The number of such examples is too small to
justify the assumption of an l-dialect to account for them. Such an
l-dialect does in fact occur later in the Magadhan Prakrit, but it was
limited to a small area, and this Prakrit cannot account for forms
with l out of r which occur in the later Vedic literature. It is also
to be noted that in some cases where a change l > r has been assumed
(e.g. lup- compared with Lat. rumpo) it is more likely that l is original.
- But remember that raposa is from rap-os-a ¨s/th with a tail¨, it has the same root as Spanish rabo ¨tail¨and rábano ¨radish¨, also good old Rapunzel of the fairy tails.
"Joao S. Lopes" <josimo70@...> wrote:Raposa seems to be superficially similar to lopas^a. Is there any Iranian equivalent of Indian lopas^a ? Something like *laupasa or *raupasa? The Alans was settled in Iberia.
Perhaps *raupasa>*rapausa>raposa ???----- Mensagem original ----
De: Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@ yahoo.com>
Para: cybalist@yahoogroup s.com
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2007 21:29:37
Assunto: Re: [tied] Re: Ossetic foxIt´s not my view but in some histories of the Spanish language, that statement has been made. I have nothing authoritative to say about it.I was asking about the derivation of ruvas et al. from the IE root. What are the steps?
Gordon Barlow <barlow@candw. ky> wrote:
BlankRick. I don't think it's reasonable to state with certainty "The
animal was named after the vegetable". I can concede the possibility that
animals were named after vegetables, but then all things are possible. Not
all are plausible, though, and it seems more likely (to me, this is) that
the name for a fox and the name for a radish are not cognates but homonyms.
As to the derivation of any animal's name from an IE name: I make no claim
one way or another. I think it was Piotr who once wrote that IE as a single
posited language without dialects can have had only a momentary existence,
and I agree with that line. There is too much danger of over-shooting and
under-shooting for anyone to be sure of any IE word.
I will say no more than that the words at issue are compatible - perfectly
compatible - with variants of English "wolf' - and the Latin word for "fox",
too. My general line of enquiry with words is: what cognates are
recognisable in the dialects of England, and how might they have become
differentiated through the interaction of speakers of the dialects?
"Lupus" and "vulpus" are clearly dialectal variants, so the origin might not
have been all that far back from their currency.
>The animal was named after the vegetable --both the vegetable and the
animal were (supposedly) named because of their prominent tail
(metaphorically in the case of radishes and other members of that family).
Perhaps raposa is a taboo form. I can vaguely see your derivation from the
IE root of wolf, but could you elaborate a bit more on how you derived it?
>>But ruvas, raev, etc are perfectly compatible with dialectal variants of
English wo(l)f, pronounced woof. With respect, the idea of calling an animal
after a vegetable because of its tail is not plausible. So I suggest any
relationship with radishes is unlikely.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/cybalist/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/cybalist/ join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:cybalist- digest@yahoogrou ps.com
mailto:cybalist- fullfeatured@ yahoogroups. com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cybalist-unsubscrib e@yahoogroups. com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs. yahoo.com/ info/terms/
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora!
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.