Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: slowing bugs--CABLE CLAMP

Expand Messages
  • k4oso
    Hi Grover, Have you conducted any speed tests with your clamp yet? If so, what kind of results did you yield? Also, will there a picture(s)? Milt k4oso ...
    Message 1 of 20 , Jun 18 7:24 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi Grover,
      Have you conducted any speed tests with your clamp yet? If so, what
      kind of results did you yield? Also, will there a picture(s)?
      Milt k4oso

      --- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Grover Cleveland" <clevelandg@...>
      wrote:
      >
      > Buggies All,
      >
      > I bought a large cable clamp of a size I believe is close to the
      one used on
      > the bug at KPH (http://www.radiomarine.org/Pictures/HIST-RS-OP-
      4.jpg). The
      > weight of the cable clamp is 1.0 oz. while the weight of the
      standard
      > Vibroplex weight is 0.4 oz. That's a significant difference.
      >
      > Grover K7TP
      >
      > On 6/17/07, David Ring <n1ea@...> wrote:
      > >
      > > Yes, that was exactly what came to mind, Fred. The large
      diameter
      > > McElroy weights which allow the weight to be nearer the balance
      point.
      > >
      > > I don't have one to measure but they were significantly larger in
      diameter
      > > and thinner in thickness than the Vibroplex weights.
      > >
      > > The big diameter centers the weight at a certain spot. I was
      speaking in
      > > a different perspective than you were - I was concentrating on
      the weight at
      > > the close to the pivot perspective, but what you're saying is
      also correct.
      > >
      >
      >
      > --
      > Grover Cleveland K7TP
      >
      > "Morse - everything else is QRM"
      >
    • Grover Cleveland
      Buggies All, I attached a cable clamp to a standard Vibroplex to conduct tests on the weight s effectiveness. I concluded nothing in terms of speed that isn t
      Message 2 of 20 , Jun 19 6:42 AM
      • 0 Attachment
        Buggies All,

        I attached a cable clamp to a standard Vibroplex to conduct tests on the weight's effectiveness. I concluded nothing in terms of speed that isn't obvious.

        However, the cable clamp is 1.0 oz. and the standard Vibroplex weight is 0.4 oz. It would have the advantage, in line with the current discussion, of concentrating the weight in one spot on the pendulum.

        A photo is attached.

        Grover K7TP

        On 6/18/07, k4oso <k4oso@...> wrote:

        Hi Grover,
        Have you conducted any speed tests with your clamp yet? If so, what
        kind of results did you yield? Also, will there a picture(s)?
        Milt k4oso

        --- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Grover Cleveland" <clevelandg@...>
        wrote:
        >
        > Buggies All,
        >
        > I bought a large cable clamp of a size I believe is close to the
        one used on
        > the bug at KPH (http://www.radiomarine.org/Pictures/HIST-RS-OP-
        4.jpg). The
        > weight of the cable clamp is 1.0 oz. while the weight of the
        standard
        > Vibroplex weight is 0.4 oz. That's a significant difference.
        >




        --
        Grover Cleveland K7TP

        "Morse - everything else is QRM"
      • Richard Meiss
        Hi, Buggies - Been lurking for a long time, just listening to the scratchy dots and bug weight threads, and my 2 cents worth has come to the surface. Isaac
        Message 3 of 20 , Jun 19 7:18 AM
        • 0 Attachment
          Hi, Buggies -

               Been lurking for a long time, just listening to the "scratchy dots" and "bug weight" threads, and my 2 cents worth has come to the surface.

               Isaac Newton showed long ago that what matters about the effective mass of an object (as far as distant measurements go) is the center of mass.  This is why the law of universal gravitation treats the center-to-center distance between two massive bodies to calculate the gravitational attraction.  From a more earthly point of view (but just as important to a bug enthusiast) is the fact that for any cylindrical weight, whether it is long and thin or short and fat, the center of its mass will be on its long axis and equidistant from either end.  This is the distance from the pendulum spring that matters. 

               The advantage of a short and fat weight is that it allows for a greater range of speed adjustment because it takes up less space on the pendulum and can be moved further back and forth.  The advantage of a long thin weight is that it is less likely to run into stuff (like terminal posts, damper supports, etc.) as the pendulum swings.  And a long thin weight with a setscrew near one end can be extended out beyond the actual end of the pendulum to provide greater slowing.
               When I have finished my current round of bug-building, I intend to work further on a new way to slow a bug - by effectively (but not permanently) reducing the strength of the pendulum spring.  I will report back if I am successful (but probably not if it doesn't work!)

               I have enjoyed the bits of bug lore that these posts have provided, and I have done a lot of book marking of interesting sites.  Thanks to all.

               73 de Rich, WB9LPU


          -----Original Message-----
          From: Grover Cleveland
          Sent: Jun 19, 2007 9:42 AM
          To: cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [cw_bugs] Re: slowing bugs--CABLE CLAMP

          Buggies All,

          I attached a cable clamp to a standard Vibroplex to conduct tests on the weight's effectiveness. I concluded nothing in terms of speed that isn't obvious.

          However, the cable clamp is 1.0 oz. and the standard Vibroplex weight is 0.4 oz. It would have the advantage, in line with the current discussion, of concentrating the weight in one spot on the pendulum.

          A photo is attached.

          Grover K7TP

          On 6/18/07, k4oso <k4oso@...> wrote:

          Hi Grover,
          Have you conducted any speed tests with your clamp yet? If so, what
          kind of results did you yield? Also, will there a picture(s)?
          Milt k4oso

          --- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups .com, "Grover Cleveland" <clevelandg@. ..>
          wrote:
          >
          > Buggies All,
          >
          > I bought a large cable clamp of a size I believe is close to the
          one used on
          > the bug at KPH (http://www.radiomar ine.org/Pictures /HIST-RS- OP-
          4.jpg). The
          > weight of the cable clamp is 1.0 oz. while the weight of the
          standard
          > Vibroplex weight is 0.4 oz. That's a significant difference.
          >




          --
          Grover Cleveland K7TP

          "Morse - everything else is QRM"

        • k4oso
          Hi Grover, Maybe I m the only one to whom its not obvious:-) But, what did you find out about speed, using the clamp? Nice pic....and appears to be
          Message 4 of 20 , Jun 19 8:01 AM
          • 0 Attachment
            Hi Grover,
            Maybe I'm the only one to whom its not obvious:-) But, what did you
            find out about speed, using the clamp?
            Nice pic....and appears to be historically correct.
            73, Milt k4oso

            --- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com, "Grover Cleveland" <clevelandg@...>
            wrote:
            >
            > Buggies All,
            >
            > I attached a cable clamp to a standard Vibroplex to conduct tests
            on the
            > weight's effectiveness. I concluded nothing in terms of speed that
            isn't
            > obvious.
            >
            > However, the cable clamp is 1.0 oz. and the standard Vibroplex
            weight
            > is 0.4oz. It would have the advantage, in line with the current
            > discussion, of
            > concentrating the weight in one spot on the pendulum.
            >
            > A photo is attached.
            >
            > Grover K7TP
            >
            > On 6/18/07, k4oso <k4oso@...> wrote:
            > >
            > > Hi Grover,
            > > Have you conducted any speed tests with your clamp yet? If so,
            what
            > > kind of results did you yield? Also, will there a picture(s)?
            > > Milt k4oso
            > >
            > > --- In cw_bugs@yahoogroups.com <cw_bugs%
            40yahoogroups.com>, "Grover
            > > Cleveland" <clevelandg@>
            > > wrote:
            > > >
            > > > Buggies All,
            > > >
            > > > I bought a large cable clamp of a size I believe is close to the
            > > one used on
            > > > the bug at KPH (http://www.radiomarine.org/Pictures/HIST-RS-OP-
            > > 4.jpg). The
            > > > weight of the cable clamp is 1.0 oz. while the weight of the
            > > standard
            > > > Vibroplex weight is 0.4 oz. That's a significant difference.
            > > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            >
            > --
            > Grover Cleveland K7TP
            >
            > "Morse - everything else is QRM"
            >
          • Grover Cleveland
            Milt - What I discovered is that the effect of a one ounce weight at that point is that the speed (on my bug at least) is to reduce the speed to about 25 wpm.
            Message 5 of 20 , Jun 19 8:42 AM
            • 0 Attachment
              Milt -

              What I discovered is that the effect of a one ounce weight at that point is that the speed (on my bug at least) is to reduce the speed to about 25 wpm. With one standard weight (0.4 oz.) out at the end of the pendulum the speed was more like 30+ wpm. Your mileage may vary.

              Cheers,

              Grover K7TP

              On 6/19/07, k4oso <k4oso@...> wrote:

              Hi Grover,
              Maybe I'm the only one to whom its not obvious:-) But, what did you
              find out about speed, using the clamp?
              Nice pic....and appears to be historically correct.
              73, Milt k4oso



              --
              Grover Cleveland K7TP

              "Morse - everything else is QRM"
            • P. Grover Cleveland
              I noticed something else on Les Burger s bug (http://www.radiomarine.org/historic-5.html) that I had not noticed before. It would seem as though there is still
              Message 6 of 20 , Jun 19 9:08 AM
              • 0 Attachment
                I noticed something else on Les Burger's bug
                (http://www.radiomarine.org/historic-5.html)
                that I had not noticed before. It would seem as though there is still
                a standard Vibroplex weight at the end of pendulum, that is in
                addition to the cable clamp. I'll purchase a larger cable clamp (I
                think that the one I bought is a size too small) and add a standard
                weight at the end of the arm as see what the result is.

                Grover K7TP

                'sperimentin' with bugs
              • n6vl
                I earlier wrote off the McElroy idea. I had attached a flat style 1 oz weight to a .4 oz round weight on my Original using a long nylon screw. I still had
                Message 7 of 20 , Jun 20 8:00 AM
                • 0 Attachment
                  I earlier wrote off the McElroy idea. I had attached a flat style 1
                  oz weight to a .4 oz round weight on my Original using a long nylon
                  screw. I still had another .4 oz a little closer. The total weight
                  was 1.8 oz, from the three weights, was not enough to slow it down.
                  And the action felt shaky.

                  On further thought, that really isn't the equilavent of a McElroy
                  style weight. The extra weight was concentrated above the lever and
                  there was still two .4 oz weights present. I can't really claim I
                  tried the McElroy method.

                  I also found these adjustments are quite complex. There are many ways
                  to add the weight to slow down a bug. And the same method won't
                  behave the same way on a different bug.

                  I've been playing with my Original and found there are so many
                  interactions. It is too complex for a hobbyist like me to come up
                  with hard rules.

                  I'd like to see a photo of the McElroy bug. The idea is intriguing.

                  I also want to give the cable clamp a try. My Original has a 5/32"
                  diameter rod. I guess that is the size of cable clamp to look for. I
                  wonder if a pair of wing nuts would work for quick adjustments. They
                  might be too close and hit each other. Also a chrome job might be
                  neat on a cable clamp.

                  That said, I am sorry about writing off the McElroy weight earlier in
                  this thread. I am a newbie at bug and was a little impatient at the
                  results I was getting.

                  73,

                  Steve N6VL
                • Troy, W6HV
                  Steve, A very nice photo of a McElroy bug like mine can be seen at http://www.w1tp.com/7627.jpg . 73, Troy, W6HV ... From:
                  Message 8 of 20 , Jun 20 9:30 AM
                  • 0 Attachment
                    Steve, A very nice photo of a McElroy bug like mine can be seen at  http://www.w1tp.com/7627.jpg  .
                    73,
                    Troy, W6HV
                    ----- Original Message -----
                    From: n6vl
                    Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:00 AM
                    Subject: [cw_bugs] Re: slowing bugs
                    ----------- I'd like to see a  photo of the McElroy bug. The idea is intriguing. ------------
                    73,

                    Steve N6VL



                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.