Re: [XTalk] The Little Apocalypse--Part V
- --- Frank McCoy wrote:
> ... in declaring the Logos to be the Man, Philo emphasises thatI don't follow this logic at all. An image cannot be the same as
> he is the Image of God. Since an image reflects the original, this
> means that God is the MAN. This, in turn, means that the Logos, as
> he is the Son of God, is also the Son of MAN.
that of which it is an image, and yet you conclude the opposite,
namely that the image (Man) is identical with that of which it is
an image (God)!