Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [XTalk] The Dutch Radical Approach to the Pauline Epistles

Expand Messages
  • Gordon Raynal
    ... Robert, Thank you for your note. not as generally accepted by traditional Palestinian Jews, as you know from my note is where we will disagree. Just to
    Message 1 of 21 , Aug 2, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      "Robert C. Davis" wrote:

      > Part of the issue, it seems to me, is whether it is credible to assume that
      > the overwhelming attention paid to apocalyptic thinking in Jewish Palestine
      > during the period before the destruction of Jerusalem was not shared
      > generally by Palestinian Jews and thus by Palestinian Jewish-Christians by
      > extension. In order to make that assumption, one would have to suggest that
      > this apocalyptic world-view was not as generally accepted by traditional
      > Palestinian Jews as has been suggested, and that thus there were whole
      > groups/factions among Palestinian Jews that in fact neglected or overlooked
      > it.

      Thank you for your note. "not as generally accepted by traditional
      Palestinian Jews," as you know from my note is where we will disagree.
      Just to stir the pot a tad;)!, a central issue in this, as you are well
      aware, is how one conceives of what is "core/ early" and what is the
      product of extended reflection/ redaction/ extension. Just as a thought
      model from an earlier era... the Ezra-Nehemiah traditions tell of the
      central "official thought" of the post Exilic era. Such as the
      Chronicler retells Israel's story with an eye towards Central cultic
      faithfulness. And this represents a dominant Temple piety viewpoint.
      And yet the Hebrew Scriptures also contain a lampooning of this dominant
      viewpoint (Jonah!... a parabolic response in the guise of a prophetic
      book). This little example shows the vibrancy of the tradition and the
      strength of maintaining the various strong voices from the past. And
      the Duetero canonical books reveal the continuation of this diversity.
      To jam, so to speak, the Wisdom of Solomon and Ben Sira into "a
      generally held apocalyptic view," in my view, does not do justice to the
      breadth of the theological constructive possibilities that were accessed
      in the Hebraic tradition and parties. And so again, from TANAK and from
      the Deutero Canonicals we know of a Hebraic/ Jewish wisdom heritage.
      The parables and aphorisms of Jesus are wisdom theological and ethical
      forms. The mission strategy is "here and now" response that is
      consonant with a wisdom theological and ethical response. And then
      besides... that Jesus voiced something that wasn't "generally accepted"
      seems to be very much the case! (thus the crowds in Nazareth and others
      puzzle: "What is this wisdom that has been given to him?" Mark 6:2).
      And so again, that this profoundly thoughtful and provocative response
      was quickly reflected upon in relation to the range of theological
      voices from the past comes as no surprise to me at all. That the
      apocalyptic took on a special cogency across the following decades makes
      special sense;)! After all, someone who was understood by his friends
      as parabling "the Kingdom of God" would be seen to be a pretty dim sage
      if that wisdom wasn't understood as taking into account the increasing
      slide into violence and mayhem. That, after the Roman Jewish War, a
      central emphasis was placed on this (such as in Mark 13), pardon, "just
      sort of makes sense!" But then again... the collected writings that
      came together preserve not just "a general apocalyptacism," but indeed
      such as Ep. James, which is clearly a wisdom focused epistle, Hebrews a
      work that is centered in Priestly Theology, etc.

      So, we will have to continue to disagree about this. With Dom Crossan I
      think underneath both Q and Thomas is a common sayings source. That
      source is a wisdom collection. And such views as you present here just
      don't push me away from paying close attention not only the genre of
      that collection, but, of course... the content! And so just to end this
      with a bit of a poem:)... let me end with what I think is vintage HJ:

      "The kingdom of God is not coming with things that can be observed; nor
      will they say, "Look here it is!" or "There it is!" For the kingdom of
      God is among you." (NRSV Luke 17:21). Pardon my southern expression,
      but "this just ain't an apocalyptic affirmation."

      Gordon Raynal
      Inman, SC
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.