From: "Bob Schacht" <r_schacht@...
> Thanks for introducing us to Herrmann. It has often seemed to me that the
> dating of the books of the NT is a house of cards.
So, possibly, is the quest for the HJ, yet we doggedly struggle on, do we
not? Dating of the NT books provides a crucial reference for many of the
conclusions to the quest and for this reason it is important that the dates
we adopt stand on a solid footing.
> For those propounding a later dating, have the views of Herrmann, Munck et
> al. with respect to dating been fully reviewed in English journals? If so,
> I'd appreciate references.
I am afraid I lack the facilities to be able to supply references to reviews
at the moment. I could, however, try to sum up the arguments arguments of
some of these authors on a specific issue.