Re: [XTalk] re: Seminar Voting
- At 05:14 PM 8/2/00 -0400, Dawson, Gail wrote:
>GD: The results by category may have been published in the Seminar'sThe results (and explanations for why they voted that way) for the
>journal _Forum_ (someone else on this list may know for certain).
sayings in Mark and parallels are found in the Red Letter edition
of Mark. This may be easier for people to find than the journal.
I believe the other Red Letter editions are still in the planning
Stephen C. Carlson mailto:scarlson@...
Synoptic Problem Home Page http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/synopt/
"Poetry speaks of aspirations, and songs chant the words." Shujing 2.35
- I had written:
No one has ever claimed that the JS database represents the final word on
determining the historicity of the Gospel accounts for all time; it is
simply a snapshot of scholarly consensus at a given moment.
Rikk Watts wrote:
Sorry to nit-pick ... but with respect and without prejudice, I don't think
anyone would honestly claim that JS even represents "scholarly consensus."
To clarify: The JS is a corporate body of scholars, reporting their
findings as a body, not as individuals. My intent might have been clearer
in my message if I had written "_a_ scholarly consensus"--that is, the
scholarly consensus *of* the JS.