[XTalk] Misnamed thread
- Nathan McGovern wrote:
> Mike Grondin wrote:[snip]
> >>I'm confused as to why you say that Paul seems to have been
> >>closely associated with John.
> >Unless the authors of GJohn have swung John over to Paul's side against his
> >(John's) will, the positions expressed there in the name of John include
> >siding with Paul against Jacob on the justification/salvation thingy, and a
> >defense of transubstantiation against those in the movement who objected to
> >it. I'd also cite as evidence the fact that Paul occasionally puts himself
> >in opposition to Peter and Jacob, but never to the third pillar.
> I thought that is what you would say; and although I agree that GJohn is
> more Pauline than Jacobean, I would not agree that GJohn should be at all
> associated with John.
The subject of these messages is no longer consistent with the header under which
they were sent (Eucharist). May I ask, then, that if you, Nathan and Mike, or
anyone else, wishes to continue an exchange on the substance of the messages
above, that you change the header to be a more accurate reflection of what is
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626