Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

"Gabriel stone" location(??); and Essenes

Expand Messages
  • goranson@duke.edu
    Two notes on a Jerusalem Report/Post article, The Qumran Quandry By Ziv Hellman
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 22, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Two notes on a Jerusalem Report/Post article, "The Qumran Quandry" By Ziv
      Hellman
      http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=1&cid=1215331033237&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

      1) Reportedly, David Jesselsohn (the owner) and Israel Knohl speculated that
      the--I add, possibly fake--inscription was found "apparently on the east coast
      of the Dead Sea. Knohl says that based on the geological composition of the
      stone, it was hewn near the narrow peninsula between the two main basins of the
      Dead Sea - and that there was a Jewish community in that vicinity in antiquity.
      He also posits the existence of another tablet containing earlier parts of the
      story, which seems to begin in the middle in the stone Jeselsohn purchased." I
      am not a geologist; is this claim of a Lisan-limited provenance technically
      plausible? Positing a second tablet seems imaginative to say the least. This
      inscription does not appear to resemble known tomb inscriptions. Knohl's
      interpretation may mix two streams of thought.

      2) Reportedly, "[Lawrence] Schiffman points to a major puzzle relating to the
      Essenes - they are not mentioned in any ancient Hebrew text. "The first time
      the word 'Essenes' is written in Hebrew is during the Renaissance," asserts
      Schiffman. This is particularly anomalous given that Josephus portrayed the
      Essenes as the third major political-religious movement in the late Second
      Temple period, alongside the Pharisees and Sadducees - yet, in contrast to the
      latter two groupings, neither the New Testament nor the entire corpus of
      Talmudic writings ever once speak of the Essenes. Nor does the word appear in
      the Dead Sea Scrolls themselves."
      Though the Modern Hebrew for Essenes is not in the scrolls, the Hebrew
      original for the Greek spellings of Essenes, 'osey hatorah, observers of torah,
      is in the Qumran mss, in texts (the pesharim) recognized on other grounds as
      Essene. That "Essenes" came from Hebrew was recognized, and in effect
      predicted, as early as 1532 by Philip Melanchthon in J. Carion, Chronica
      (Wittenberg, 1532)
      folio 68 verso: "Essei / das ist / Operarii / vom vort Assa / das ist
      wirken." And N. Serarius cited D. Chytraeus [Kochhafe], Onomasticon, as
      deriving Essenes from the Hebrew root 'asah and calling Essenes "factores
      legis" in J. Triglandius, Trium scriptorium illustrium de tribus judaeorum
      sectis syntagma (Delft: A. Berman, 1703) 107.

      Stephen Goranson
      http://www.duke.edu/~goranson
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.