Re: [XTalk] Anne Rice and the scholars
- Ah yes.. nothing like good ol' dispassionate and even-handed scholarship
isn't it great that we are not like the great unwashed, these people of the
land who know nothing? Apparently scholarly conversions can quench not only
imagination but grace and humility.
Bring on the vampires... and let the rough beast slouch on slow thighs to
Regent College, Vancouver.
On 3/11/05 7:03 AM, "Loren Rosson" <rossoiii@...> wrote:
> On October 31, Jeffrey Gibson wrote about Anne Rice's
> novel of Christ:
>> We've already had a preview of what her
>> take on Jesus is in Memnoch the Devil.
>> Very Gnostic.
> That was then, but this is now. Evidently Rice has
> become a Tom Wright fan, so the bishop's disdain for
> gnosticism may have rubbed off. I still haven't read
> the novel itself, but I read the afterword this
> morning. Quite interesting. These are the scholars she
> was inspired by when she began researching Jesus in
> 2002, and now recommends to her readers: John A.T.
> Robinson, Richard Bauckham, Martin Hengel, Jacob
> Neusner, Geza Vermes, David Flusser, Luke Timothy
> Johnson, Raymond Brown, Sean Freyne, Eric M. Myers,
> Larry Hurtado, Craig Blomberg, Craig S. Keener,
> Kenneth L. Gentry, Mary S. Thompson, Robert Alter,
> Frank Kermode, Eric Auerbach, Ellis Rivkin, Lee I.
> Levine, Martin Goodman, Claude Tresmontant, Jonathan
> Reed, Bruce J. Malina, Kenneth Bailey, D. Moody Smith,
> C.H. Doddm D.A. Carson, Leon Morris, R. Alan
> Culpepper, and "the great Joachim Jeremias" (see pp
> "I learned something from every single book I
> examined," she says.
> Then, just love it, comes the praise for Wright:
> "The scholar who has given me perhaps some of my most
> important insights and who continues to do so through
> his enormous output is N.T. Wright. N.T. Wright is one
> of the most brilliant writers I've ever read, and his
> generosity in embracing the skeptics and commenting on
> their arguments is an inspiration. His faith is
> immense, and his knowledge is vast. In his book, _The
> Resurrection of the Son of God_, he answers solidly
> the question that has haunted me all my life.
> Christianity achieved what it did, according to N.T.
> Wright, because Jesus rose from the dead. It was the
> fact of the resurrection that sent the apostles out
> into the world with the force necessary to create
> Christianity. Nothing else would have done that." (pp
> "Nothing else"? Religious conversions evidently stifle
> the novelist's imagination. (Hope this never happens
> to me. People find my fiction difficult enough to take
> as it is.)
> Another one of her convictions is that all gospels
> were written before 70 CE. "I found it absolutely
> impossible that the gospel writers could not have
> included the Fall of the Temple in their work had they
> written after it as critics insist. It simply didn't
> and doesn't make sense." (p 315)
> Then a howler:
> "When Jewish and Christian scholars begin to take this
> war seriously, when they begin to really study what
> happened during the terrible years of the siege of
> Jerusalem, the destruction of the Temple, and the
> revolts that continued in Palestine right up through
> Bar Kokhba...Bible studies will change." (p 316)
> No comment necessary. But what happened to the
> scholars she recommended with such enthusaism?
> I liked Rice better when she was into vampires.
> Loren Rosson III
> Nashua NH
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> The XTalk Home Page is http://ntgateway.com/xtalk/
> To subscribe to Xtalk, send an e-mail to: email@example.com
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
> List managers may be contacted directly at: email@example.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
I assume you mean the url for the journal which I posted this am
Xtalk member, Lisbeth S. Fried's, new book is now available, The Priest and
the Great King: Temple-Palace Relations in the Persian Empire, together with
this review in Denver Journal.
Richard H. Anderson