Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [XTalk] Resurrection

Expand Messages
  • Patrick Narkinsky
    ... I would take a different tack: that Jesus was the first fruits of the general resurrection and that, by raising him from the dead, God has promised to do
    Message 1 of 189 , Jan 1, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      On Dec 31, 2004, at 10:44 PM, Horace Jeffery Hodges wrote:

      > The difference that most Christians would ascribe to
      > Jesus is that he is divine, being one person of the
      > triune Godhead, whereas everyone else who will be
      > resurrected (whether physically or spiritually) is
      > human, all too human.

      I would take a different tack: that Jesus was the "first fruits" of the
      general resurrection and that, by raising him from the dead, God has
      promised to do likewise for those who are "in" Christ. I take this to
      be Paul's take as well (see 1Cor 15.12-20).

      However, I doubt that that this is the average pew-sitter's view, at
      least in Evangelical circles. In my experience, their emphasis would
      be on Jesus' crucifixion resurrection as an act of atonement, and what
      was unique about Jesus was his innocence. That is, Jesus was a perfect
      sacrifice, without sin, who could therefore atone for the sins of all
      mankind. Those who take this point of view tend not to think of
      "heaven" in terms of resurrection, and even Jesus' resurrection would
      be emphasized much less than Jesus' crucifixion. Even the Left-Behind
      crowd talks about the general resurrection of the dead as being "raised
      up" or something, reserving the term "resurrection" for Jesus himself.

      Patrick

      --
      Patrick Narkinsky - patrick@...

      "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
      - Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan
    • Patrick Narkinsky
      ... I would take a different tack: that Jesus was the first fruits of the general resurrection and that, by raising him from the dead, God has promised to do
      Message 189 of 189 , Jan 1, 2005
      • 0 Attachment
        On Dec 31, 2004, at 10:44 PM, Horace Jeffery Hodges wrote:

        > The difference that most Christians would ascribe to
        > Jesus is that he is divine, being one person of the
        > triune Godhead, whereas everyone else who will be
        > resurrected (whether physically or spiritually) is
        > human, all too human.

        I would take a different tack: that Jesus was the "first fruits" of the
        general resurrection and that, by raising him from the dead, God has
        promised to do likewise for those who are "in" Christ. I take this to
        be Paul's take as well (see 1Cor 15.12-20).

        However, I doubt that that this is the average pew-sitter's view, at
        least in Evangelical circles. In my experience, their emphasis would
        be on Jesus' crucifixion resurrection as an act of atonement, and what
        was unique about Jesus was his innocence. That is, Jesus was a perfect
        sacrifice, without sin, who could therefore atone for the sins of all
        mankind. Those who take this point of view tend not to think of
        "heaven" in terms of resurrection, and even Jesus' resurrection would
        be emphasized much less than Jesus' crucifixion. Even the Left-Behind
        crowd talks about the general resurrection of the dead as being "raised
        up" or something, reserving the term "resurrection" for Jesus himself.

        Patrick

        --
        Patrick Narkinsky - patrick@...

        "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
        - Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.