Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: RE: In the Temple

Expand Messages
  • RSBrenchley@aol.com
    In a message dated 25/06/04 23:06:00 GMT Daylight Time, Ernie Pennells writes:
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 26, 2004
      In a message dated 25/06/04 23:06:00 GMT Daylight Time, Ernie Pennells
      writes:

      <<I pick up mixed messages regarding the Tyrian shekel. It was obligatory
      for
      the temple tax, but was it required for other transactions?>>



      Not as far as records go. It was a lot purer than other coinages in the area
      at the time, which breaks all the rules; it was too profitable to melt a
      very pure coinage and recoin it, so it would normally tend to disappear.
      Som3ething kept the shekel in being, and the obvious assumption is that it was
      produced specifically for the Temple tax, as purity of the coin seems to have been
      the major issue here.

      Regards,

      Robert Brenchley


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.