Re: [XTalk] The Khaboris Codex
- At 12:50 PM 5/13/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Is this another one of those neat finds like "The Secret Gospel of Mark"Jim,
>that really doesn't forward our knowledge much but as an oddity offers us
>And, as an aside, I think Bob is mistaken; I havent had anything to do with
>this manuscript. The notion that the NT was originally an Aramaic document
>(a la lamsa) is silly to me.
I did not mean to imply that you were supporting anything about the
manuscript; merely that an Internet search turned up an exchange on
BGreek-L that spun off from something about the manuscript in which you
participated. Your involvement in the discussion on BGreek was less
important than the fact that it came up there, although I don't know why.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]