Re: [XTalk] (last sent too fast) Ideological Dissonance in Thomas
- Bill Foley wrote on Tuesday, December 17, 2002:
I've been working on the same thing lately for a page of a new site (pg
'Early Dating Disputed' being worked on offline so far). [in progress site
at http://members.aol.com/dagoi/ClemTom.html ] As a matter of fact I've
using the same book (and Davies latest book - Davies actually makes the most
clear statement for using #12 and James for chronological dating of gThom
Patterson et al hedge it a bit).
Bill, by "Davies," do you mean Steve Davies? And to which book are you
James would certainly not agree with gThom, and the authors of gThom would
not agree with James. The argument clearly points to a time when James the
Just is well sainted and long dead. Ted, can I reproduce this post on the
site where it gets to James?
I am not sure I understand what you mean by "on the site where it gets to
*James*." I am assuming you are referring to the new site, which do I
understand is not yet up and running? But "to James?" I am sorry, but I
am confused about what you are asking. And how would you want to use my
post? Could you clarify?