Re: [XTalk] Betz and the SM (was: Matthew Created SM?)
- Dear Ted,
I have not yet read this book, but was certainly aware of its existence. This is
a question I've only just started thinking about, and since I've had a
dissertation in a completely unrelated area to complete, I'll appeal to the
"692-page tome" feature of this work as to why I've not yet engaged it!
On the other hand, while I do plan to consider seriously Betz's arguments, let me
say briefly (again!) that I did preface my claim with the fact that I was assuming
the 2DH, and QMatt and QLuke are not part of this per se.
Thanks for this,